CNN's Dana Bash reported Friday on the irony of President Obama hitting
Mitt Romney's connections to Bain Capital when he himself has received
donations from Bain employees. CNN has highlighted Obama's hypocrisy on
this matter before, but this specific story has certainly not received
much air-time – if any at all – in the last two weeks.
"But isn't it hypocritical for the Obama campaign to keep money from
employees of a company it goes after as job-killers?" correspondent Dana
Bash asked during the segment. Yet this story of Obama's clear
hypocrisy has certainly not received the attention it merits on CNN.
Obama raised almost $125,000 from Bain Capital employees, including three who gave the maximum amount of cash the law allows. One of the donors was even helping the campaign raise money from other sources. "$125,000 is a lot of money from people who work at a company the Obama campaign and its allies vilify," Bash pointed out.
[Video below. Audio here [1].]
It is one thing for Obama to be a hypocrite by knocking Romney and Bain
Capital while raising money from the financial sector and from the head
of a private equity firm. It is an even bigger story, however, if he
railed against Bain's practices and yet raised money directly from Bain
employees. That is exactly what Bash reported, and yet that story has
been largely – if not entirely – ignored by CNN.
Although CNN questioned [2]
the Obama campaign's attack ad on Romney and Bain, which first aired
May 14, they did not report his donations from Bain employees in the
hours after the ad broke.
On the evening of Tuesday May 15, Anderson Cooper aired a critical
"Keeping Them Honest" report on Obama's hypocrisy for hitting Romney and
Bain and yet raising money from the head of a private equity firm who
had done business with Bain. Anchor Brooke Baldwin also noted this
hypocrisy on Tuesday morning.
A partial transcript of the segment, which aired on May 25 on The Situation Room at 4:15 p.m. EDT, is as follows:
GLORIA BORGER: President Obama put Mitt Romney on notice
this week, that he's going to keep hammering away at his record as CEO
of Bain Capital. But it turns out that the President has his own
connection to the firm, and that would be a money connection.
(...)
DANA BASH, CNN correspondent: Well Gloria, the Obama campaign has
always prided itself on getting contributions small and large from all
walks of life, but one source of campaign cash can probably be described
with one word – awkward.
(...)
BASH: The irony: some of the money to pay for this TV ad may have come
from inside the very company Team Obama is demonizing in it – Bain
Capital. It turns out employees of Bain Capital have given $124,900 in
donations to the Obama campaign in this election cycle. And three of
those Bain Capital donors – Mark Nunnelly, Steven Pagliuca, and Jonathan
Lavine, have given the President's re-election efforts the maximum
amount allowed by law, $35,800.
In the case of Lavine, he didn't just write his own check to the
President, he's what's called a "bundler," a fundraiser who helps the
Obama campaign raise money from others. $125,000 is a lot of money from
people who work at a company the Obama campaign and its allies vilify,
like in this Super PAC ad.
(...)
BASH: All of the nearly $125,000 in donations to the Obama campaign
from Bain employees were made in 2011, well before the President's team
started accusing Romney of killing jobs while at Bain. Still, the Obama
campaign tells CNN, they do not intend to return any campaign cash from
Bain employees.
"No one aside from Romney is running for president highlighting their
tenure as a corporate buyout specialist as one of job creation, when in
fact, his goal was profit maximization," said Obama campaign spokesman
Ben LaBolt. But isn't it hypocritical for the Obama campaign to keep
money from employees of a company it goes after as job-killers?
(...)
BORGER: Dana, but if you're working for private equity and you want to
give a political contribution now, do you think twice about it?
Particularly the Obama campaign, who seems to be sort of taking a whack
at you?
BASH: It's hard to imagine not, particularly it's not just private
equity, but in this particular case the very company that is the
subject, of course, of all of these ads and attacks by the Obama
campaign. Just talking anecdotally to people who I know who raise money
from the Romney campaign – for the Romney campaign, I should say – they
have told me that many contributors who traditionally gave to President
Obama on Wall Street are no longer doing it specifically for this
reason. He's certainly getting money from private equity, but some of
them are switching over to Mitt Romney because they're sick of being
vilified.
-- Matt Hadro is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center