http://archive2.mrc.org/taxonomy/term/4881/all en http://archive2.mrc.org/articles/times-vs-times-anti-bush-nsa-surveillance-ruling <div class="field field-type-text field-field-subtitle"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> Was the anti-Bush surveillance ruling &quot;a careful, thoroughly grounded opinion&quot; or did it &quot;use[d] circular reasoning&quot; and &quot;substitute passion for analysis&quot;? </div> </div> </div> <div class="field field-type-nodereference field-field-source"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item odd"> <div class="field-label-inline-first"> By</div> <a href="/author/clay-waters">Clay Waters</a> </div> </div> </div> <p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Shocking absolutely no one, the New York Times editorial page last Friday<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/18/opinion/18fri1.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fEditorials" target="_self">celebrated</a> Judge Anna Diggs Taylor's ruling that declared Bush's terrorist surveillance program unconstitutional, under the headline "Ruling for the Law."</p><p><a href="http://archive2.mrc.org/articles/times-vs-times-anti-bush-nsa-surveillance-ruling" target="_blank">read more</a></p> Articles TimesWatch AdamLiptak AnnaDiggsTaylor bush Editorials EricLichtblau NewYorkTimes NSA NYTimes Surveillanec Terrorism TimesWatch TimesWatch.org WashingtonPost Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:49:00 +0000 admin 5111 at http://archive2.mrc.org