ABC Stresses U.S. Failures & Harm, CBS U.S. Success & Help -- 03/26/2003 CyberAlert

1. ABC Stresses U.S. Failures & Harm, CBS U.S. Success & Help
ABC's Peter Jennings stresses U.S. failures, enemy propaganda and how the war has hurt Iraqi civilians. But CBS and Dan Rather look at the positive, see U.S. successes and highlight how coalition forces are helping Iraqi civilians. Tuesday's World News Tonight and CBS Evening News provided illuminating illustrations of the contrasting approaches to the same events.

2. People in Baghdad Feel Safe Because Regime Says War Going Well
From Baghdad, ABC's Richard Engel conceded in a Tuesday night story that U.S. bombing in the capital city hasn't "caused many civilian casualties" and so Iraqis are going about their lives as normal because, he suggested, "the Iraqi government appears to everyone here to be functioning normally" with "press briefings by senior leaders" who say "that Saddam Hussein is firmly in control of the country and directing the course of the war which Iraq says is going extraordinarily well." But that explanation was too much even for Peter Jennings who passed along how "perhaps the citizens were quite relaxed in Baghdad because they knew up to this point that the United States was not targeting them."

3. ABC's Moran Holds Bush Culpable for "Plight" of People in Basra
Acknowledging that Iraq setting mines in the harbor which has prevented civilian aid from being delivered was "a wicked thing to do," ABC News reporter Terry Moran, nonetheless, held Bush administration policy culpable for the plight of the people in Basra. "The coalition battle plan was to bypass Basra and leave the more than half million citizens there essentially to fend for themselves," Moran told White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer at the Tuesday briefing. Moran demanded: "Does the administration take any responsibility for the plight of the people in Basra?"

4. No Flowers for U.S. Troops, So Do Iraqis Really Like Hussein?
On Tuesday's Good Morning America, Charles Gibson pressed General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, repeatedly about how the U.S. has an "inadequate" number of troops to fulfill the mission. An hour later, Diane Sawyer asserted that Americans expected that "American troops would be treated as liberators in the streets." She wanted to know: "What happened to the flowers expected to be tossed the way of the Americans? Was it a terrible miscalculation?" She soon proposed to a guest expert in Kuwait: "Did American officials miscalculate the way the Iraqi people really feel about Saddam Hussein?" And she wondered if "this is going to be a long, protracted, quagmire of a war?"

5. Peter Arnett: Hussein Orders U.S. POWs "Be Treated Well"
Very reassuring. On Tuesday's Today Peter Arnett passed along how an Iraqi official "told us in a press conference that President Saddam Hussein had personally ordered" that the prisoners of war held by Iraq "be treated well" and be "given the best medicine and the best food."

6. War's Reality Versus Video Reminds Alter of Schindler's List
In this week's Newsweek, Jonathan Alter applied the Reaganesque tendency to meld real events with Hollywood classics in his mind but, unfortunately, he thinks it's somehow appropriate to compare the Bush-led coalition's liberation of Iraq to the Nazi genocide of the movie about the holocaust, Schindler's List.

>>> Buy your tickets today! Just one day until the MRC's "2003 Dishonor Awards: Roasting the Most Outrageously Biased Liberal Reporters." CyberAlert subscribers can get tickets for $150, $25 off the regular price, for the Thursday, March 27 event in Washington, DC. For all the info and how to buy tickets:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/notablequotables/dishonor/03/info.asp
Cal Thomas will serve as Master of Ceremonies with Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham amongst those helping to present awards.
Rush Limbaugh was one of the judges who picked the winners, along with Lawrence Kudlow, Steve Forbes, William F. Buckley Jr., Lucianne Goldberg, Michael Reagan, Kate O'Beirne, John Fund, Robert Novak and Walter Williams.
Plus, the Charlie Daniels Band will sing some songs. The award titles:
Ozzy Osbourne Award (for the Wackiest Comment of the Year)
I Hate You Conservatives Award
Ashamed of the Red, White, and Blue Award
And They Called It Puppy Love Award
The I'm Not a Geopolitical Genius But I Play One on TV Award
Come to the dinner to watch the winning quotes, see who wins and learn which conservatives will accept each award in jest. It will be a lot of media bashing fun. <<<

ABC Stresses U.S. Failures & Harm,
CBS U.S. Success & Help

ABC's Peter Jennings stresses U.S. failures, enemy propaganda and how the war has hurt Iraqi civilians. But CBS and Dan Rather look at the positive, see U.S. successes and highlight how coalition forces are helping Iraqi civilians.

Tuesday's World News Tonight and CBS Evening News provided illuminating illustrations of the contrasting approaches to the same events.

-- Contrast #1. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's view of the war as conveyed during his press briefing earlier in the day:

• ABC. Jennings set up the one and only soundbite from Rumsfeld shown during his program: "And here is the summary line of the day from Mr. Rumsfeld."
Rumsfeld: "We're still, needless to say, much closer to the beginning than the end."

• CBS. The soundbite from Rumsfeld played during a story by David Martin focused on Iraq's ruthlessness in using human shields: "This is the behavior of desperate men. Iraqi authorities know their days are numbered, and while the Iraqi regime is on the way out, it's important to know that it can still be brutal, particularly in the moments before it finally succumbs."

-- Contrast #2. The future of Iraqi television, with Jennings relaying the Iraqi propaganda line while CBS's Martin pointed out a reality ignored by the Iraqi regime's propaganda line:

• ABC. Jennings: "Iraqi television is still on the air. They broadcast a statement from Saddam Hussein today. He urged peasants and his para-military guerillas, the Fedayeen, to kill the American invaders whatever way they can."

• CBS. David Martin: "The Air Force blasted Iraqi TV with an experimental electromagnetic pulse device in an attempt to knock it off the air and shut down this propaganda machine which continues to show the regime's firmly in charge and ignores the fact that the American Army is almost literally at the gates."

-- Contrast #3. The people of Basra and Umm Qasr are suffering because of the coalition invasion, or after the Iraqi regime cut off their water coalition forces are now providing them with much needed and appreciated aid.

• ABC. Jennings suggested President Bush broke a promise: "On Sunday President Bush said that massive amounts of aid would begin arriving in country in 36 hours. It simply hasn't happened."
John Donvan in Basra dated the loss of water in Basra to five days ago, meaning the war caused it, and outlined the potentially disastrous results: "Day and night the fighting in Basra has been too intense for aid workers to enter the city. A million people live in Basra, hundreds of thousands of them have been without clean water for five days, the city's electricity went out last week. The possible consequence: Cholera for a start, also diarrhea which Iraq often kills young children."
Later, Donvan made brief mention of how rations are being handed out in Umm Qasr, but without any video of happy civilians.

• CBS. Rather introduced CBS's story which highlighted how coalition forces have come to the rescue of the people in Umm Qasr: "Also in southern Iraq, the small gulf port of Umm Qasr will be a major route for relief supplies into Iraq. This includes drinking water for desperate civilians. CBS's Scott Pelley was there with allied forces bringing the first fresh supply."
Pelley reported over video of happy civilians carrying water containers, as transcribed by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth: "In Umm Qasr, they came when they heard the word: water. There hadn't been any water in more than a week. And so they ran -- down a road as long and as miserable as a day of thirst. British and American troops poured the first humanitarian aid into Iraq buckets at a time. Major James Thorpe runs an Army unit trying to restore life to Umm Qasr. Major, why do these people not have water?"
Major James Thorpe, U.S. Army, explained it was cut off by the Iraqi regime before the war began: "Basra, it's a city just north of us, is normally the location where drinking water comes from for these folks here in Umm Qasr. As it turns out, just before the war started, approximately four or five days before it did, the water that normally flows down here via truck was turned off."
Pelley: "By who?"
Thorpe: "Well, basically by the ruling party, the Baathist party, and I guess, Saddam Hussein."
Pelley: "Thorpe's civil affairs team will get water and power flowing. They want to convince Iraqis that life will improve. A man in the water line told us that the people are nervous. They think Saddam is coming back. So more than just water, civil affairs hopes to give them confidence."

People in Baghdad Feel Safe Because
Regime Says War Going Well

ABC's freelancer in Baghdad, Richard Engel, conceded in a Tuesday night story that U.S. bombing in the capital city hasn't "caused many civilian casualties" and so Iraqis are going about the lives as normal because, Engel suggested, "the Iraqi government appears to everyone here to be functioning normally" with "press briefings by senior leaders" who say "that Saddam Hussein is firmly in control of the country and directing the course of the war which Iraq says is going extraordinarily well."

But that explanation was too much even for anchor Peter Jennings who passed along how "somebody else observed today that perhaps the citizens were quite relaxed in Baghdad because they knew up to this point that the United States was not targeting them."

As if at some point the U.S. will begin targeting them?

Engel began his piece on the March 25 World News Tonight: "In Baghdad you'd never know U.S. and British forces are closing in on the city. A week of bombings, which haven't caused many civilian casualties, seemed to have given Iraqis what could be a false sense of security..."

After noting how restaurants are doing a brisk business and that he enjoyed mutton at one, Engel asserted: "Iraqis have even started to climb on rooftops to watch the explosions. The calm could come from the fact that the Iraqi government appears to everyone here to be functioning normally. Again today there's been an endless stream of press briefings by senior leaders and the overall message is that Saddam Hussein is firmly in control of the country and directing the course of the war which Iraq says is going extraordinarily well, thanks largely to the support of what Iraq calls heroic Baath Party miners and local tribesmen. Iraq also maintains that U.S. and British troops are targeting civilians and today parade the coffins of some of them through the streets in a public funeral."

Jennings interjected immediately after Engel's story: "Somebody else observed today that perhaps the citizens were quite relaxed in Baghdad because they knew up to this point that the United States was not targeting them."

ABC's Moran Holds Bush Culpable for
"Plight" of People in Basra

Acknowledging that Iraq setting mines in the harbor which has prevented civilian aid from being delivered was "a wicked thing to do," ABC News reporter Terry Moran, nonetheless, held Bush administration policy culpable for the plight of the people in Basra. "The coalition battle plan was to bypass Basra and leave the more than half million citizens there essentially to fend for themselves," Moran told White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer at the Tuesday briefing. Moran demanded: "Does the administration take any responsibility for the plight of the people in Basra?"

MRC analyst Ken Shepherd caught this exchange, at the March 25 briefing, which followed Fleischer explaining how Iraqi mining of its port is what is preventing ships from delivering food and medical supplies.

Moran: "But isn't it more than the mines? Obviously, the Iraqi regime has mined this harbor and that is a wicked thing to do but the coalition battle plan was to bypass Basra and leave the more than half million citizens there essentially to fend for themselves until we can get this aid flowing. It's not that we can't only get ships into Umm Qasr, it's that we didn't take Basra, which is now a scene of utter chaos and total unpredictability and there's no telling when aid will flow there. Does the administration take any responsibility for the plight of the people in Basra?"
Fleischer: "Well, the administration is the one working with our allies that is working to get the food and the water to the people of Iraq. The people of Iraq have been put in harm's way as a result of the actions of the Iraqi military, or the fedayeen and the brutal regime under which they've lived that doesn't care about the people of Iraq. And that's why the United States and our allies are the ones put in this position, working through, as I mentioned, a series of groups providing money and transport. We stand ready, willing, and able. The mines need to be moved and the mines will be moved. The people will be fed."

No Flowers for U.S. Troops, So Do Iraqis
Really Like Hussein?

ABC's derogatory attitude carries over onto its morning show. On Tuesday's Good Morning America, Charles Gibson pressed General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, repeatedly about how the U.S. has an "inadequate" number of troops to fulfill the mission. An hour later, Diane Sawyer asserted that Americans expected that "American troops would be treated as liberators in the streets." She wanted to know: "What happened to the flowers expected to be tossed the way of the Americans? Was it a terrible miscalculation?"

She soon proposed to a guest expert in Kuwait: "Did American officials miscalculate the way the Iraqi people really feel about Saddam Hussein?" And, less than a week into the war, she wondered if "this is going to be a long, protracted, quagmire of a war?"

MRC analyst Patrick Gregory caught the two March 25 segments in question. During the 7am half hour, Gibson pounded away at Myers via satellite:

-- "It is very obvious from what we've seen so far that you have some very good soldiers over there, but the question is, do we have enough of them?"

-- "I want to come back to this question of do we have enough soldiers over there. Given the resistance that we have faced now in smaller cities like Umm Qasr and Nasiriyah, do we have enough to handle an all out fight in this city which is really about the size of Los Angeles, and still keep an eye on those smaller cities and maintain supply lines as well?"

-- "But this is gonna be, from all indications, a tough fight as we get close to Baghdad and around Baghdad itself. You just talked about more forces flowing up toward that area. Is there going to be a pause, a day, a couple of days, three days, four days, number one while we wait out the sandstorm, number two while more troops flow up to that area, and number three while we carry out air attacks against entrenched Iraqi forces?"

At the top of the 8am half hour, Diane Sawyer in Kuwait City plugged an upcoming segment: "Coming up in this half hour, I think a lot of Americans did believe that American troops would be treated as liberators in the streets, at least in the south. What happened to the flowers expected to be tossed the way of the Americans? Was it a terrible miscalculation? We'll find out what an expert has to say coming up."

Sawyer soon set up her pre-taped piece: "As we said, American officials tended to indicate that American troops would be treated as liberators in the streets of Baghdad. We have a couple of questions now. Even if it's going to happen in the future, why isn't it happening now?"

Sawyer answered her own question: "They're the pictures so many Americans believed they would see -- Iraqis filled with joy, relief, celebrating in the street."
President George W. Bush: "The tyrant will soon be gone, the day of your liberation is near."
Sawyer, over matching video of happy Iraqi when U.S. troops arrived in Safwan: "Saddam Hussein's omnipresent image ripped down, and U.S. soldiers embraced, evoking memories of liberations past. France, 1944, Panama, 1989, and Afghanistan just a year ago. In Safwan and other towns in the Iraqi South, the feelings of joy quickly gave way to suspicion and anger as Iraqis struggled to find the bare necessities of life."
Sawyer then showed the clip of one guy complaining to ABC News reporter, a clip already run on more than one ABC News prime time special, World News Tonight and Nightline: "My children is hungry, my old man hungry, my woman hungry. No medicine, no water, no food."
Sawyer: "As the coalition forces face some tough opposition, will the American public, expecting to see its troops as liberators, have to steel itself for more disturbing images?"
Iraqi man interrogating an American POW: "What's your name?"
Sawyer: "Is it a warning for the future?"
Tariq Aziz at a press conference: "If the American soldiers, the invaders, will enter the territory of Iraq, they will be received with bullets. Not flowers, not music, with bullets."

Back on live, Sawyer introduced her guest: "I'm joined now by Doctor Shafreeq Ghabra, he is President of the American Kuwait University, and we're happy to have you with us, an expert on Iraq. So what about this, did American officials miscalculate the way the Iraqi people really feel about Saddam Hussein?"
Ghabra: "Well, this is a war, and you do not underestimate Iraqi nationalism. Do not underestimate at the same time, the time Saddam had to prepare and to disperse his groups among the population."
Sawyer: "Does this mean that they will never treat Americans as liberators, it's not going to come at any time?"

Ghabra suggested it will take time for Iraqis to overcome their mistrust.

Sawyer moved on to another U.S. mistake: "You're saying it's uncertainty, and not necessarily digging in against the Americans. I've got a couple of questions though. We have heard that the Iraqi troops, the regular troops, in fact have disguised themselves as civilians, have pretended to surrender when in fact they weren't surrendering, have posed as journalists, in order to shoot at Americans. Is that also a miscalculation about the extent to which they're willing to fight?"

And Sawyer soon arrived at the suggestion of a "quagmire," inquiring: "Do you think they [Iraqi troops] are under duress or do you take from this that this is going to be a long, protracted, quagmire of a war?"
Ghabra rejected her premise: "I don't see this as a long quagmire, it depends how this will all end, and I think the most serious question is how will America treat the Iraqi people and Iraq, once this is over."

Sawyer at least allowed Ghabra to end on an up note: "In a word, you still seem optimistic that the Americans will be seen as liberators, at some point?"
Ghabra: "At some point, if they work it correctly, politically, and in all other dimensions."

Peter Arnett: Hussein Orders U.S. POWs
"Be Treated Well"

Very reassuring. On Tuesday's Today Peter Arnett passed along how an Iraq official "told us in a press conference that President Saddam Hussein had personally ordered" that the prisoners of war held by Iraq "be treated well" and be "given the best medicine and the best food."

Arnett, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens noticed, relayed from Baghdad on the March 25 Today: "Now last night we saw on television pictures of the two more American POWs, the pilots of those Apaches making seven prisoners. And this morning the Trade Minister Mohammed Sali [sp?] told us in a press conference that President Saddam Hussein had personally ordered that these prisoners be treated well. The Iraqis are aware that there is increasing American concern about the treatment of their people that are being held. A total of I believe, seven now, the Trade Minister said Saddam wants them given the best medicine and the best food."

I guess that good treatment only applies to the ones Hussein decided to not have executed.

War's Reality Versus Video Reminds Alter
of Schindler's List

In this week's Newsweek, Jonathan Alter applied the Reaganesque tendency to meld real events with Hollywood classics in his mind but, unfortunately, he thinks it's somehow appropriate to compare the Bush-led coalition's liberation of Iraq to the Nazi genocide of the movie about the holocaust, Schindler's List.

(The MRC's Tim Graham submitted this item for CyberAlert.)

"Listen for the Human Voice" read the headline over Alter's piece in the March 31 Newsweek. The subhead: "As pure TV, it was like a suburban Fourth of July fireworks show, or a second-rate Vin Diesel movie. But war isn't entertainment."

Many years ago, Alter covered the media beat for Newsweek, so his media angle on the war this week was a homecoming of sorts. After recalling how Tom Brokaw was touched during his on-air interview with Nancy Chamberlin, the mother of killed helicopter pilot Jay Aubin who urged the media to go beyond gee-whiz amazement at military technology and remember the human sadness, Alter went to the movies:
"We all have movie reels unspooling in our minds, and mine that afternoon was an unlikely one: Steven Spielberg's 'Schindler's List.' The Holocaust scenes in that film are all shot in black-and-white, except for the bright red coat of one little girl -- a glimpse of humanity against the numbing machinery of death. Mrs. Chamberlin's voice was that red coat. And so the anchor and the military experts -- barely containing their emotions -- set aside their war-gaming for a few minutes of reflection on the feelings of loss that families never lose, a moment of television at once excruciating and strangely welcome."

Certainly this war and its imposing technology can be characterized as "numbing machinery of death," but isn't there some moral difference between a war of liberation with a wary eye on civilian casualties and an intentional campaign to "cleanse" Europe of millions of Jewish civilians?

Alter's story is online at: http://www.msnbc.com/news/889519.asp

> With our DisHonors Awards on Thursday, this may be the last CyberAlert of the week, though on Friday I will distribute a rundown of what occurred at the awards event and e-mail subscribers will receive something on Thursday, probably a recent edition of Notable Quotables.
You'll be sorry that you missed the DisHonors Awards event. There is still time to order tickets, but you really need to do so today. Call (703) 683-9733. See the details at the top of this CyberAlert. -- Brent Baker