CBS's Smith Claims Prop 187, Blocking Handouts to Illegals, Lost --8/13/2003
2. Condemning Schwarzenegger for Backing "Anti-Immigration Measure"
3. ABC Admires "Idealism" of Human Shields, Victims of U.S. Fines
CBS's Smith Claims Prop 187, Blocking Though by an overwhelming 59 to 41 percent margin in 1994 California voters backed Proposition 187 to cease providing government services and handouts to illegal aliens, on Tuesday's Early Show CBS's Harry Smith maintained that Arnold Schwarzenegger's admission he supported the proposition shows he is out of step with California voters since "that was a ballot initiative that was voted down by, that most Californians did not support." But on Wednesday morning, Smith admitted his error: "I completely booted it, I completely misspoke, I completely misunderstood it. I thought that the voters had voted against it. It, in fact, passed overwhelmingly." On Tuesday morning August 12, discussing the California recall with Craig Crawford of Congressional Quarterly, Smith, the MRC's Brian Boyd noticed, proposed: "His past though could become an issue. One of the things that was brought up over the weekend -- he supported a ballot initiative that limited state help to illegal immigrants. That was a ballot initiative that was voted down by, that most Californians did not support. If someone mounts a tough enough campaign, Gray Davis who is a very tough campaigner, if he mounts a significant enough campaign, will any of this stuff stick to him?" Crawford, who used to run the Hotline political news service, failed to correct Smith: "What they're worried about is the conservative voters, so they've put the word out, the Schwarzenegger campaign, that he backed a proposal to deny social services to Hispanics, to illegal immigrants. The Hispanics and Asian-Americans in California perceive that as an attack on them, so that is a problem with those voters, but his real problem, the only real problem he's got is a conservative revolt against him because he's a social liberal..." Not all at CBS assume Californians couldn't possibly take a non-liberal position. On Tuesday night's CBS Evening News, Jerry Bowen reported: "Prop 187 denied public services to undocumented immigrants. It passed by a huge margin but was eventually thrown out by the courts."
Though a ruling by an activist liberal court did later block enforcement of the majority's will, Prop 187 not only won, it won by huge margins in much of the state. The MRC's Tim Graham tracked down this summary of results as recounted in a post-election Field Poll report: That's online, as a PDF, at: field.com Fast forward to this morning and just past 7:30am Smith conceded his misunderstanding:
Condemning Schwarzenegger for Backing Arnold Schwarzenegger is a blank slate, but the second that NBC and CBS learned that he once took a conservative position, they pounced, condemning the position as possibly fatal to his campaign, though his view was shared at the time by most Californians. NBC Nightly News anchor Brian Williams distorted the issue as he plugged an upcoming story on Tuesday night: "And later, he once supported a famous anti-immigration measure. Will minority voters hold that against Arnold Schwarzenegger?"
But the victorious measure, Proposition 187, was not "anti-immigration," but anti-illegal immigration and pro-legal immigration and pro-taxpayer. As noted in item #1 above, if not blocked by a liberal activist court, it simply would have ceased forcing taxpayers to subsidize services and welfare handouts to illegal immigrants who could still come to California and work, they just couldn't go on welfare, get food stamps or expect their kids to go to public schools for free. If that's true, then Latinos in California have little understanding of U.S. history. Those Democrats in the South were using the power of the state to deny equal rights to legal citizens and, all too often, employing violence against them. That's nothing like what Proposition 187 would have done if a court hadn't blocked its enforcement. O'Donnell relayed that Schwarzenegger's vote for Prop 187 was "bad enough according to Latino officials, but the real outrage is Schwarzenegger's campaign co-chair, former Governor Pete Wilson, who led the fight for 187." Over on the CBS Evening News, reporter Jerry Bowen similarly held Wilson in low repute as Bowen devoted a story to how Schwarzenegger's vote "for a controversial proposition may now hurt him with Latinos." A full rundown of the August 12 NBC and CBS stories: -- NBC Nightly News. Brian Williams set up the story, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth: "All the serious candidates in this race, including Arnold Schwarzenegger, are reaching out to California's growing number of Latino voters, who traditionally have voted Democratic. But among Latinos, there are indications that Schwarzenegger, a Republican, could give the state's Democratic Lieutenant Governor, Cruz Bustamante, a run for his money. Still, one of Schwarzenegger's own votes some years ago may turn out to hurt him now among minorities. Here is NBC's Kelly O'Donnell."
O'Donnell: "Already California's most controversial election, but wait. Now the recall is a reminder of another divisive vote nearly ten years ago."
Bowen began: "Arnold Schwarzenegger failed to vote in five of California's past eleven elections, but a vote he did make in 1994 for a controversial proposition may now hurt him with Latinos. At 17 percent of registered voters, Latinos may make the difference."
ABC Admires "Idealism" of Human Shields, Before the war ABC offered a sympathetic look at the efforts of U.S. citizens who traveled to Iraq to serve as "human shields." Upon hearing that the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control has informed the protesters that they face a $10,000 fine for, as the Washington Post put it, "violating U.S. sanctions that forbade most travel to Iraq and commerce with Saddam Hussein's regime," ABC returned Tuesday night with another empathetic story which treated them as victims of the U.S. government who were just expressing their idealism. World News Tonight anchor Charles Gibson noted that after safely getting out of Iraq, "Americans who declared themselves shields face a different kind of threat from the U.S. government, one that may be much harder to avoid." Reporter Dan Harris described one of the leftists, though obviously not identified as such: "He was one of about 300 self-proclaimed 'human shields' on an idealistic and ultimately futile quest to stop the war." Harris sympathetically concluded that the man "says he always knew idealism had a price. He just didn't know it would be this high." Gibson introduced the August 12 World News Tonight story, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth: "Before the recent Iraqi war, hundreds of people from various countries went to Iraq to act as so-called 'human shields.' It was a symbolic gesture. Most of them left Iraq before the fighting actually began. Well, now Americans who declared themselves shields face a different kind of threat from the U.S. government, one that may be much harder to avoid. Here's ABC's Dan Harris."
From New York City, Harris began: "Less than four weeks before the war, Ryan Clancy moved into a food storage facility outside of Baghdad." In a Tuesday Washington Post story, Jonathan Weisman reported that the fines are far from a sure thing: "A Treasury official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said none of the shields has yet been fined. They have been told they may have violated U.S. sanction laws, been informed of the potential penalty and been asked for more information, he said. The shields will be allowed to contest their fines before a federal judge, he said." Weisman warned: "The administration's efforts to enforce the law are handing war protesters a new megaphone to broadcast their opposition to U.S. policies in Iraq." As if ABC News needed much of an excuse to pick up on the whining.
Then again, maybe ABC's February stories helped those interested in law enforcement. Weisman recounted: "The human-shield brigade that descended on Iraq was never shy about publicity, which may explain how Treasury has tracked them down. [Treasury spokesman Taylor] Griffin said Treasury is tracking down the human shields through customs records, travel documents and 'high-profile' activities. Clancy spent quality television time on CBS-TV's evening news broadcast, he said. That appearance was on CNN's Live From show during the 1pm EDT hour on Monday. Weisman undermined any idea of a political agenda behind the fines: "Such sanctions are fairly routine, especially for those doing business with Cuba, Griffin said. The New York Yankees settled a $75,000 fine with Treasury this spring for allegedly violating sanctions on Cuba. Playboy Enterprises Inc. paid $27,500 for Cuba sanctions charges. Caterpillar Inc. paid $18,000 for similar charges, according to documents posted on the Treasury Department's Web site."
For the Washington Post story in full: www.washingtonpost.com ABC News offered sympathetic looks on Wednesday [February 26] at the efforts of some from the U.S. to act as "human shields" in Iraq. On World News Tonight, Dan Harris in Baghdad profiled "Ryan Clancy, a substitute English teacher from Milwaukee," who "became so convinced that a war with Iraq would be unjustified and unwise that he sold his stake in a local record store and came to Baghdad" to "act as a human shield." After playing a clip of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld saying that "deploying human shields is not a military strategy, it's murder," Harris offered some moral equivalence: "But human rights lawyers say if the Pentagon bombs places inhabited by human shields that too would be a war crime." Harris worried about how the human shields "are facing" the "problem" of "how to avoid being tools of the Iraqi government" when the regime is providing food and housing. Imagine that. But Harris assured viewers that Clancy "says he's not here to protect Saddam Hussein, just the Iraqi people." Wednesday morning on Good Morning America, Diane Sawyer interviewed two human shields from Iraq and while she offered a friendly explanation for their cause and wondered what would motivate a 63-year-old human [Faith Fippinger] to participate, she also challenged one about how they can only go where Hussein wants. Harris, who focused on a grain facility, failed to raise the issue of the "shields" being placed around military installations and neither morning or evening segment suggested in any way that there is anything villainous about Americans going to the aid of an enemy nation. END of Excerpt from earlier CyberAlert
For that CyberAlert article in full: www.mediaresearch.org -- Brent Baker
|