According to Chris Matthews, the radically pro-abortion
Kathleen Sebelius has "done more to reduce the number of unwanted
pregnancies than anyone in this country." Matthews assailed pro-life
demonstrators who approve of "dictatorial laws" to reduce abortion.
According to him, these protesters need to give the woman, who has made
birth control "free," a "little credit."
The Hardball anchor on Thursday insisted that Sebelius, who as
Kansas governor vetoed a partial birth abortion bill and entertained
radical doctor George Tiller at the official residence, is a hero.
Matthews praised, "It could be argued that this one person has done more to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies than anyone in our country." [MP3 audio here.]
Explaining this assertion, Matthews failed to grasp basic economics:
"Making birth control free, which is what she has done, will do more to
reduce unwanted pregnancies than anything I can imagine."
Making birth control "free" does not make it without cost. It still has to be paid for by someone.
Matthews assailed those who oppose Sebelius speaking at Georgetown University,
Friday. He lectured pro-lifers: "This is how we do things in a free
society that values life, not with dictatorial laws, but with
persuasion."
The MSNBC host attempted to speak on abortion as a practicing Catholic.
Previously, Matthews mocked Catholicism as a religion that attracts bigots.
A transcript of the May 17 segment, which aired at 5:57pm EDT, follows:
CHRIS
MATTHEWS: Let me finish tonight with this. It's a subtle, for me,
recommendation to those protesting the appearance tomorrow by HHS
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at Georgetown University. You oppose her
speaking because of her position in support of abortion rights. So, let
me propose a thought to you, who like me, value life. Will protesting
the secretary's appearance radically reduce the millions of abortions in
this country each year? Will it reduce by one? Well, what would? What
practical, workable step would radically reduce the number of abortions
in this free country of ours? I would suggest that it is reducing the
number of unwanted pregnancies. Get the young men having sex with young
women to stop having unwanted pregnancies. Stop protesting government
officials and start talking to the people actually involved in having
these millions of unwanted pregnancies. Tell them, get the word to them
as parents, teachers, loved ones that if they're going to have sex, and
that's a decision they ought to accept moral responsibility for, please
use birth control. Just stop having unwanted pregnancies. This is how we
do things in a free society that values life, not with dictatorial
laws, but with persuasion. I say this as someone that accepts the moral
teaching of my church, but also as someone who accepts the practical
need here for effective action, not more protests.
And now a word about Secretary Sebelius. It could be argued
that this one person has done more to reduce the number of unwanted
pregnancies than anyone in our country. She's behind the policy of
requiring insurance companies to cover birth control. Making birth
control free, which is what she has done, will do more to reduce
unwanted pregnancies than anything I can imagine. Certainly
getting people to stop having sex is another way. Her way will, I bet,
have a more dramatic result. It could actually work. I know what the
protesters believe, they believe they can stop abortion by protest, by
rallies, by stopping people from speaking at graduation ceremonies.
Common sense tells me that the way to stop unwanted pregnancies and
abortions is not in a graduation ceremony, but on what we used to call
dates. It's when a young man and woman are together. We can argue
against them having sex, we can also suggest that when relationships
become close and respectful, birth control is far better than an
unwanted pregnancy. So, here in my role as a secular adviser, I suggest
those of us that think that this country would be better off with
radically fewer abortions actually begin doing something about it.
Kathleen Sebelius deserves credit. Again. Again. It could certainly be
argued for her doing her part. Rather than protesting what she's
doing, pro-lifers and pro-choicers might think about giving her a
little credit, or at least let her speak.
-- Scott Whitlock is the senior news analyst for the Media Research Center. Click here to follow him on Twitter.