CNN Punts on Obama Dereliction In Libya In Favor of Romney Tape
Just how bad is the media's track record this election season? On
Monday, CNN's Anderson Cooper led his show with a manufactured Mitt
Romney controversy instead of news that the U.S. may have had advance
warning on deadly terrorist attacks.
Here's how Cooper started his show: "On Libya, late word on what
American diplomats may have been told about the threat from Muslim
extremists, terrorists, just three days before the attack that killed
four Americans in Benghazi. We're going to have that, but first, what
could be a campaign blockbuster, what Mitt Romney said to big money
donors about President Obama voters when he didn't think cameras were
rolling."
[Video below. Audio here.]
A possible fatal national security blunder took a backseat to a campaign soundbite leaked by liberal magazine Mother Jones.
And Cooper hyped the dire consequences for Mitt Romney, quoting Daily
Beast columnist and former Bush consultant Mark McKinnon saying the
remark could be "potentially crippling" for Romney.
Cooper later remarked on the Libya terrorist attack, "It sounds like if
they [the U.S. embassy] were warned three days before, that's pretty
damning, no?" Yet this potentially "damning" story involving national
security and the deaths of American diplomats was not deemed as
newsworthy as a Republican campaign gaffe.
A brief transcript of the segment, which aired on Anderson Cooper 360 on September 18:
ANDERSON
COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: We begin tonight with breaking news on two fronts
tonight. On Libya, late word on what American diplomats may have been
told about the threat from Muslim extremists, terrorists, just three
days before the attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi. We're
going to have that, but first, what could be a campaign blockbuster,
when Mitt Romney said to big money donors about President Obama voters
when he didn't think cameras were rolling. A camera was rolling, though,
and Mother Jones magazine got the video. Here's a portion of it.
(Video Clip)
MITT ROMNEY, Republican presidential candidate: There are 47 percent of
the people who will vote for the President no matter what. All right.
There are 47 percent who are with him who are dependent upon government,
who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has the
responsibility to care for them, who believe that they're entitled to
health care, to food, to housing, you name it. But that's – that's an
entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will
vote for this President no matter what. And I mean the President starts
off with 48, 49 – he starts off with a huge number. These are people who
pay no income tax."
(End Video Clip)
COOPER: Now we got these quotes from Mother Jones magazine, which
obviously has a political slant. The Romney campaign has not denied the
substance of what's in the tapes. In the tape, you hear Mitt Romney
saying, "My job is not to worry about those people. I'll never convince
them." He also joked that he'd have a better shot if his father, George
Romney, the former governor of Michigan and automotive – head of an
automotive company had been Mexican. The question now, does the playing
of this tape hurt or help his chances?
(...)
[8:16]
COOPER: More breaking news now. The attack in Benghazi that killed four
Americans, including the U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens might not
-- or, I should say, might have been, or excuse me, might not have been
preventable, but it should have been foreseeable, according to our
reporting.
Our reporting from inside Libya seems to indicate that Libyan officials
believe that the extremist threat was growing and say they directly
warned American diplomats about it. Now this is new video, the commotion
outside the Benghazi consulate where friendly Libyans had just
discovered a badly wounded Ambassador Stevens in a room inside.
There are frames that we're not showing of the ambassador still
apparently breathing, being taken from the scene to a hospital. Clearly
it was a tragedy, but was it a foreseeable and therefore a possibly
preventable one? So far the U.S. government's line is that the Benghazi
murders were probably a spontaneous, not premeditated reaction to that
anti-Muslim video on YouTube.
(...)
COOPER: Arwa, you've been talking to eyewitnesses on the ground there. I
understand one eyewitness heard an extremist talk about hitting a
second location. Is that true? Have you heard that? And what does that
tell you?
ARWA DAMON, CNN senior international correspondent: First of all, we do
know that a second location was attacked. That second location was
supposed to be the safe house where embassy personnel were evacuated to.
This other eyewitness, a young man, arrived on the scene saying that he
saw at least two dozen bearded men, part of a known extremist militia
here, he said, just on the outskirts, just outside the consulate
compound.
They briefly detained him because they said that he did not share their
same ideology. And during the few hours that he was in detention he
said he heard him talking about the attack on the compound, celebrating
it, and then talking about needing to get ready to go out and attack a
second compound.
All of this, of course, raising the question as to whether or not this
was a pre-planned assault as some members, senior members of the Libyan
government are claiming or whether or not it was quite simply a
demonstration that turned violent.
COOPER: Arwa, you're hearing that the U.S. should've known about this, that they were warned in advance?
DAMON: Libyan officials are telling us that they were talking to the
U.S., telling them, warning them about this growing extremist threat and
flat-out admitting that they could not control these extremist
militias, actually asking the Americans for help in doing that.
And I spoke to some military officials who say that just three days
before the attack took place, they had a meeting with senior employees
from the consulate itself where they were talking about this rising
threat against western interests. And again, highlighting the point that
they themselves could not control these militias, these gangs that roam
with pretty much pure impunity. And the ambassador himself was aware of
the growing security threat, as well, Anderson.
COOPER: And yet, I mean, his own security detail seemed very small, no?
DAMON: The front line of the compound, if you will, was Libyan guards,
but they don't have weapons, they only have walkie-talkies. There are
some armed individuals inside, Westerners, we are being told. The U.S.,
of course, not disclosing that kind of information. But it most
certainly is not the kind of security measures that one would imagine
would be put in to place in a country where the U.S. is well aware in
itself monitoring al Qaeda-affiliated extremist camps in the desert not
too far from the city of Benghazi itself.
COOPER: And let me just be clear about it. You're saying that Libyan
officials had meetings with U.S. officials inside Libya, warning of
potential threats?
DAMON: Libyan officials in Benghazi, military officials that are
members of one of the more powerful brigades and battalions, met with
officials from the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi three days before the
attack took place, they're telling us. This was a meeting that was
supposed to be centering around business and the economy. But they are
saying that they told the Americans, wait, we can't even be talking
about the economy, about bringing Western companies into Libya,
especially into Benghazi, because this threat from extremist militias,
is growing.
We at this point in time do not have the capabilities to be able to
control them or to protect Western interests. And they were asking, as
they have been for months, Anderson, the Americans for help in
controlling these extremist elements because they know what the
consequences are going to be if they become even more powerful than they
already are.
(...)
COOPER: Fran Townsend, what do you make of it? I mean it sounds like if they were warned three days before, that's pretty damning, no?
-- Matt Hadro is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center
