CyberAlert -- 03/06/2002 -- Rather's Tribute to Valor
Rather's Tribute to Valor; Helen Thomas's Rant Against War Strategy; NBC's West Wing "Non-Political"? Hardly; Koppel Top Ten?
>>> Now
online, a new Media Reality Check report by the MRC's Rich Noyes which
Washington, DC area readers may have noticed was cited today by Greg
Pierce in his "Inside Politics" column in the Washington Times.
It's titled, "Dancing Around Bill Clinton's Enron Deals; TV's
Double Standard: Networks Push Bush's Links While Downplaying
Clinton's Favors For Enron." It reported how only six of the 198
stories about Enron aired on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening shows, a
piddling three percent, "hinted at Clinton's Enron
connection." To read the March 5 Media Reality Check:
How much of whatever Rather does on the air is an act and how much is genuine is always up for debate, but in this instance his moving words appeared sincere and, of the ABC, CBS and NBC evening shows, only the CBS Evening News named those who died in action. Rather ended the March 5 CBS Evening News, as
taken down by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth, over pictures of each fallen
member of the Army, Navy or Air Force:
Appearing at the Newseum in Arlington, Virginia on Sunday, its last day in operation until it re-opens in the District of Columbia in 2006, Thomas also castigated Reagan's "social Darwinism," minimized the relevance of his "secret" arms build-up in causing the fall of communism and praised Bill Clinton, arguing: "I think his heart was in the right place. He certainly built up a great prosperity and surplus, balanced the budget, I think that he had great ideals." Conceding he "tarnished the White House with his liaisons," she predicted that would soon be overlooked since "every President looks better in retrospect, so I think that he has a legacy that will be worthwhile." The MRC's Brad Wilmouth took down some of Thomas's comments in the March 3 Newseum session with an audience shown by C-SPAN on March 4 and 5: -- On Ronald Reagan's presidency: "No question that President Reagan turned the country to the right. There was a Reagan revolution, a very conservative revolution, and it was social Darwinism. If you can't make it, tough. I mean, he did not believe in social welfare and, but at the same time, he did build up our military. He had a secret plan to spend one trillion dollars on new arms when he came in. It was secret and fortunately for us, I think, the Washington Post reporter who covered the Pentagon revealed this, but there was Hell to pay. They went after those who had leaked the story. At the end of that road, the President had spent $1.5 trillion in terms of new arms, but there is also no question that the arms race did help to break down the Soviet Union. It was already, I believe, on its last ropes, last feet, but that was the straw that broke the camel's back of having to spend more and more money on arms. But at the same time, he was a very popular President, people still long for him, and they think that he was a real president and played the part very well." So he was popular despite the fall of communism? -- On Bill Clinton's presidency: "Clinton, I think his heart was in the right place. He certainly built up a great prosperity and surplus, balanced the budget, I think that he had great ideals, but, of course, he tarnished the White House with his liaisons and, but eventually, you know, every president, time is the great healer, and every president looks better in retrospect, so I think that he has a legacy that will be worthwhile." -- On President, George W. Bush: "Work in progress. I think that his lack of real knowledge about the world, and I miss the ideals. I don't think we should arm every country that says oh, we've got terrorists here. I think we should be helping countries, helping in terms of education, food, and so forth, and I certainly think it was right to go into Afghanistan, but I don't think it's right to be contemplating what other country can we bomb next. I think the American people ought to start raising their voices and asking where are you going, what's the end goal here, what's the exit strategy, do we just because a country wants arms and military assistance, is that us?"
The MRC's Geoffrey Dickens noticed how Lauer teased an upcoming story on the March 4 Today: "And talk about social life, we'll take a look at the new found friendship between the liberal Senator Ted Kennedy and one of the most conservative Presidents, George W. Bush." The subsequent story by Jonathan Alter did not address how George W. Bush can be considered "one of the most conservative Presidents," when he signed onto a big federal education spending bill which so pleased Ted Kennedy. But at least Today tagged Kennedy as liberal. That's progress.
Largely overlooked, Sorkin also preposterously maintained of The West Wing: "We're a completely fictional, nonpolitical show." As Peggy Noonan, the only conservative adviser to the show, suggested last week on OpioninJournal.com: "Aaron Sorkin thinks the thoughts of a left-liberal. Because he is a left-liberal. And the show he writes and produces each week, the show whose storylines and dialogue he dreams up, reflects his views, utterly." Indeed, over the past few years CyberAlert has documented the many liberal themes and anti-conservative plot lines showcased on the NBC program. But before even getting to that proof, in the March 4 New Yorker article itself Sorkin boasted about pursuing a liberal plot line this season involving the rehabilitation of Al Gore. An excerpt from the New Yorker article by Tad Friend in which Sorkin referred to a then-upcoming episode which aired last Wednesday: In the semi-contemporaneous universe of "The West Wing," where the World Trade Center never fell but terrorism is now a top staff priority, President Josiah Bartlet is up for re-election this November. "Bartlet is going to be running against Governor Robert Ritchie, of Florida, who's not the sharpest tool in the box but who's raised a lot of money and is very popular with the Republican Party," Sorkin said. If this sounds familiar, it should. "It was frustrating watching Gore try so hard not to appear smart in the debates -- why not just say 'Here's my fucking résumé, what do you got?' We're a completely fictional, nonpolitical show, but one of our motors is doing our version of the old Mad magazine 'Scenes We'd Like to See.' And so to an extent we're going to rerun the last election and try a few different plays than the Gore campaign did. In the episode this Wednesday, Toby Ziegler" -- Bartlet's communications director, and the conscience of Sorkin's White House -- "is going to continue his conversation with the President, 'Your father hated your guts because you were smarter than he was. In fact, he hit you because of it, and as a result you are scared to get people mad at you with your brains. You don't want to lose as the smartest kid in class who's running against an everyman. But I'm telling you, be the smartest kid in your class. Be the reason why your father hated you. Make this an election about smart and stupid, about engaged and not, qualified and not.'" END of Excerpt From my watching of the show, it has toned down the liberal policy preaching a bit this season on issues such as gun control, child poverty and the inheritance tax, but that hasn't made the show anywhere near "nonpolitical." The season-long plot has re-played the Clinton impeachment saga, complete with mean-spirited and vindictive House committee members and staffers using the fictional "President Bartlet's" covering up of his multiple sclerosis as an excuse to hurt administration staffers by catching them in "perjury traps" and forcing them to spend money on lawyers. The only difference, Sorkin has Bartlet do what all liberals wish Clinton had done: He agrees to a joint House-Senate censure for his lack of forthrightness and now the White House staff is moving on to what really matters, like fighting terrorism. Noonan asserted that she was behind a
conservative plot line featured this season but that Sorkin made it less
conservative so it would not upset liberal sensibilities. Noonan
recounted: For Noonan's March 1 piece in full: http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/ National Review's Jonah Goldberg also took
on Sorkin's claim that The West Wing is "nonpolitical." Check
out his piece at: Now to a rundown from past CyberAlerts of liberal pronouncements and advocacy promoted on NBC's The West Wing over the past three years. Each item includes a link to the fuller CyberAlert article, some of which feature RealPlayer clips of the scenes: -- The West Wing, devoted to staffers
discussing terrorism with a group of high schoolers, gave air time to some
pretty conventional liberal points. Characters raised the "black
list," blamed "abject poverty" for terrorism and argued
that "is the same as it is right here" where gangs "give
you a sense of dignity." They also
worried about "the patriotism police." -- The West Wing featured a subplot in which
an insurance company refused to pay for emergency surgery for a gun shot
victim because he did not get pre-approval for the life-saving emergency
surgery. -- The West Wing's new conservative blonde
babe character assessed the staff of the fictional Democratic White House:
"Their intent is good, their commitment is true. They are righteous
and they are patriots." -- Dr. Laura demonized by NBC's The West Wing. Martin Sheen as the President attacked her misleading "Dr." title and sarcastically compared her claim that the Bible says homosexuality is "an abomination" to how it advocates slavery for his daughter and that his mother be burned. "You may be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the ignorant tight-ass club." http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20001019.asp#7 -- NBC's The West Wing returned Wednesday
night with a left wing shot at the idea that allowing citizens to carry
guns makes for a safer community. And a reporter agreed. -- The West Wing took a bizarre twist into very tolerant social liberalism with President Bartlet offering to order the Attorney General to help a prostitute, who just earned a law degree, gain admittance to the bar. http://www.mrc.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000517.asp#6 -- The show continued the campaign finance reform cause and added replacing "mandatory minimums" for drug convictions, which were repeatedly called "racist," with more funding for drug "treatment." http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20000510.asp#5 -- After some dialogue backing school
vouchers, NBC's West Wing went left wing on campaign finance and gays in
the military. -- Left and Right West Wing. NBC's The West
Wing delivered scenes linking census sampling opponents to the
Constitution's definition of blacks as 3/5ths a person and aired a candid
admission that liberals don't trust people to spend their money correctly. -- NBC's liberal dream State of the Union.
On The West Wing the President abandons "the era of big government is
over" theme and agrees "government can be a place where people
come together and where no one gets left behind....an instrument of
good." -- In the premiere, viewers saw how the
Hollywood Left views conservatives as the show concocted a preposterous
plot and series of scenes which portrayed leaders of the Religious Right
as anti-Semitic buffoons. The show culminated with an angry Democratic
"President Josiah Bartlet," played by Martin Sheen, indignantly
telling ministers: "You can all get your fat asses out of my White
House." Plus, off-screen West Wing stars have done quite a bit of liberal pontificating. A sampling: -- President Bush is a "moron," actor Martin Sheen, who plays the President on NBC's The West Wing, told a British magazine. He conceded that JFK womanizing "made him more substantial and human to me." Sheen also ridiculed the U.S. as he claimed "Alcoholics Anonymous and jazz are the only original things of importance" the U.S. has exported to the world. http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2001/cyb20010214.asp#5 -- A Republican character joins The West Wing tonight just after star Martin Sheen told George magazine that George W. Bush is a "bully" who is "full of s**t." A co-star called Bush "proudly uninformed" and argued that Jesus would be displeased by Bush's promotion of the death penalty. http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2000/cyb20001025.asp#3 West Wing creator/writer/producer Sorkin got
into the news last year when he was caught at the Burbank airport with
"illicit mushrooms" in his luggage. For a bio of Sorkin, who was
also responsible for the liberal preaching movie The American President
starring Michael Douglas, check the Internet Movie Database page about
him: For photos of Sorkin, go to: Finally, an excerpt from the March 4 New Yorker article by Tad Friend in which Sorkin complained about how the media are being too nice to President Bush given his failings: ....The first point Sorkin raised, speaking last week from his quarters at the Four Seasons in Los Angeles, where he was writing another episode of the show, is that something has gone awry in the media's representation of the President. "President Bush seems to be handling things very well, and I support him one hundred per cent," Sorkin said. "I also think it's absolutely right that at this time we're all laying off the bubblehead jokes. But that's a far cry from what the Times and CNN and others on whom we rely for unvarnished objectivity are telling us, which is that" -- his voice took on a worshipful tone -- "'My God! On September 12th he woke up as Teddy Roosevelt! He became the Rough Rider!'" Among these hagiographies, Sorkin said, was NBC's look at a day in the life of the Presidency, "The Bush White House: Inside the Real West Wing," which aired as the lead-in to a "West Wing" repeat a few weeks ago. "The White House pumped up the President's schedule to show him being much busier and more engaged than he is, and Tom Brokaw let it happen -- the show was a valentine to Bush. That illusion may be what we need right now, but the truth is we're simply pretending to believe that Bush exhibited unspeakable courage at the World Series by throwing out the first pitch at Yankee Stadium, or that he, by God, showed those terrorists by going to Salt Lake City and jumbling the first line of the Olympic opening ceremony. The media is waving pom-poms, and the entire country is being polite."... For the entire piece, "Snookered by
Bush," go to: As I said at the top of this item, a fresh episode of The West Wing airs tonight at 9pm EST/PST, 8pm CST/MST on NBC. For more about the show and tonight's plot, check NBC's Web page for the program: http://www.nbc.com/The_West_Wing/index.html
Apparently, on CBS Letterman has never done a Top Ten about Ted Koppel and not on NBC either, or at least none which was published in either of the two books which collected Top Tens from his NBC years. But I wasn't about to let all of my efforts go to waste. Undaunted, on the Late Show Web site I discovered how in Top Tens about other subjects Koppel's name has come up. My two favorites in light of the present goings on: -- From a 1998 list, the "Top Ten Things Dave's Kitty Would Say If It Could Talk." After #10, "Get me out of this Princess Leia costume!" came #9: "Can't we watch 'Nightline' for a change?" -- From a 1996 list, the "Top Ten Insults for Dave Letterman," #5: "This is the part of the show where I always say to myself, 'I wonder what Koppel's doing tonight'" For the Late Show's Top Ten archive: My prediction: ABC is the big loser in all of this. David Letterman will stay at CBS since he's seen how ABC treats its stars and, most importantly, he does not want to be blamed for killing Nightline. And the staff of ABC News now knows that the corporate side wants to dump Nightline as soon as they can find something else to replace it. What I wonder is if Letterman could move from NBC to CBS and now might jump to ABC, why is no one suggesting that if Nightline is replaced on ABC by the Late Show, why couldn't Koppel and his team go to CBS at 11:35pm, a time slot for which CBS would then need programming? Call it Eveningline. At the very least, I'd bet that as long as Letterman is in play Koppel will show up to anchor Nightline more than two or three times a week. -- Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers: >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe >>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<< |