CyberAlert -- 10/25/2000 -- "Texas Miracle" Just a "Mirage"?
"Texas Miracle" Just a "Mirage"?; West Wing Star Called Bush "Full of S**t" and Jesus Disappointed in Bush
Citing Bush's educational achievement boasts, CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather cast doubt: "A new study out today questioned whether it's in fact a miracle or a mirage." NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw highlighted how "the Gore campaign was eager to publicize a new study from a highly regarded and non-partisan think tank that challenges some of the Governor's claims about education gains in Texas." Democrats, CBS's Bill Whitaker admitted, "alerted the press to the report overnight and piled on today." The networks certainly didn't resist. Only FNC's Carl Cameron pointed out how the Gore campaign went beyond just "alerting" reporters. "Reporters received overnight packages from the Gore camp" with the report, Cameron observed on Special Report with Brit Hume. For a rundown of how the ABC and NBC morning shows
on Tuesday jumped on the report and an excerpt from the earlier RAND
report which had praised Texas achievements compared to other states,
check out the Tuesday CyberAlert Extra: Tuesday night's Nightline followed Bush's day on the campaign trail and reaction to the RAND study dominated two of three interview segments with Bush conducted by Ted Koppel. Now to how the broadcast networks played the education report on Tuesday night, October 24. All three led with campaign news: -- ABC's World News Tonight. After an initial story on where each candidate stands in the electoral college and their strategies, anchor Peter Jennings set up a full piece on the RAND report: "George Bush was defending his record on education in Texas. A research paper from the RAND Corporation which says that Texas students may do well on statewide tests but no better than average on a national test. The Texas Commissioner of Education said another RAND study cited remarkable gains." Dean Reynolds noted how the Bush campaign questioned
the timing of the report, but Reynolds made clear its potential damage:
"Bush has built his campaign to a large extent on his record of
improving education in Texas. Anything that cast doubt on his achievement
at this stage in the race could be fodder for the Democrats." After running a clip from Bush Communications Director Karen Hughes insisting Texas leads in improving educational achievement, Reynolds moved on to how in campaign appearances Bush mocked Gore's targeted tax cuts and suggested that if Clinton campaigns for Gore it would mean "the shadow returns." -- CBS Evening News. After the lead story on Bush versus Gore back and forth on the size of government (see item #2 for details), Dan Rather proclaimed: "Bush hit hard on another one of his main messages today, what his campaign calls the 'Texas miracle,' especially what Bush says are big gains in education. But a new study out today questioned whether it's in fact a miracle or a mirage." Bill Whitaker, as transcribed by MRC analyst Brad
Wilmouth, began: "Just about every day, George W. Bush boasts of
boosting test scores of Texas public school children and says as President
he'd do the same for students nationwide." -- NBC Nightly News. The RAND report led the
broadcast after a few words about tight poll standings. Tom Brokaw
announced: Gregory did "tell us" about the education study, but Claire Shipman did not recount Bush's attacks on Gore as a big spending. Her story instead concentrated on how Gore is working to get out the vote from key constituencies. Gregory started his story by pretending he somehow
had no control over what NBC considered newsworthy: "Well, Tom, it
became a distraction, I can certainly tell you that. Today the Bush
campaign forced to defend what it has touted as the Governor's strongest
credential, his education record in Texas. Bush has traveled to 115
schools during the campaign boasting that the state's emphasis on
accountability has led to a dramatic increase in student math and reading
test scores. But a new report from the RAND Corporation, a non-partisan
think tank, argues the so-called 'Texas miracle' in education is in
fact overstated." Gregory, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth,
outlined the new findings, though he eventually acknowledged they
contradict an earlier study by the same group: "The study shows that
those positive statewide test scores Bush points to may be inflated.
Researchers compared the Texas results to scores by Texas students on a
national achievement test and found that Texas students did not score any
higher than students in other states. The researchers suggest that
teachers may be specifically preparing students for the state exam. The
report also asserts that the achievement gap in Texas between white and
minority students is not shrinking as Bush says, it's actually growing
slightly. Today's report stands in contrast to an earlier, more broadly
focused RAND study that compared national test results across all states.
It singled out Texas as having improved dramatically. The author of that
study reaffirmed his findings today, and Bush advisors who dismiss the new
study as unscientific and politically motivated are happy to repeat
them."
Peter Jennings opened the October 24 World News Tonight by reporting the number contested states had gone up according to ABC analysis as "neither Mr. Bush nor Mr. Gore seem to be able to establish a commanding lead and hold onto it." Linda Douglass looked at some unexpected trends in the 14 toss-up states, such as how Bush campaigned in Illinois, a state earlier written off by his team while Gore spent time in Arkansas, a state expected to have been in his column. She noted Gore is behind in West Virginia because miners mad at Gore over his environmental policies and Bush has not locked up Florida because seniors prefer Gore's prescription plan. Labor leaders, she reported, are planning a $60 million door to door campaign for Gore while the NRA is "waging its biggest campaign ever" on behalf of Bush. Next, just before ABC's RAND story quoted in #1 above, Jennings reported how Bush accused Gore of planning to increase the size of government, but "Mr. Gore said he would not add one new federal employee if he's elected." Dan Rather led the CBS Evening News with the battle over the surplus and a supposed electoral college tie: "Good evening. It's just two weeks now till America chooses a new President, and these could turn out to be among the most important pre-election facts and figures. With Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George Bush battling over who is better qualified to continue growing the economy and their very different budget priorities, the U.S. government today posted the third straight budget surplus, a record $237 billion for the fiscal year just ended. The eight-year Clinton-Gore administration takes some credit for this. Bush says they don't deserve it. And there is this number. CBS News now estimates Bush and Gore are flat even at 205 electoral votes each. It takes 270 to be elected. A number of other polls have Bush with a slight lead. Both candidates were talking up their separate visions of the government's future today." John Roberts relayed those visions in a
remarkably balanced story transcribed by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth:
"The two candidates traded fire today over how best to spend the
record surplus and how much say the government should have. On that
front, George Bush believes less is best, a message he took to
Illinois today." After a Gore soundbite, Roberts noted: "Under merciless attack as an old-line Democrat who believes big government is better, Gore today pledged that if elected he would freeze the size of the federal work force." Following a soundbite of Gore making that
promise, Roberts turned to Bush: "An impossible task, claims the
Texas Governor who figures Gore's spending plans will bloat the
federal payroll." Of course, it isn't the number of employees which matters most but the level of taxation and scope of regulation.
The NBC Web site provided this summary for the October 25 edition of The West Wing airing at 8pm ET/PT, 8pm CT/MT: "When a confident Sam is outmatched by a novice Republican adviser (Emily Proctor) on a political point-counterpoint television program, an impressed President Bartlet offers to hire her as assistant White House counsel despite her party affiliation, a bold move that sends shock waves through the resentful staff. Elsewhere, Toby and Josh attend a deadlocked White House summit between representatives of pharmaceutical companies and the leaders of AIDS-ravaged African nations." The West Wing cast assessments of Bush came in a November George magazine cover story by Sharon Waxman about the show. Joining Waxman's article in a section quoting Martin Sheen, who plays The West Wing's President "Josiah Bartlet," Waxman recited his lack of appreciation for anyone not liberal: "'I think he's a bully. I don't think
he has any heart. That scares me,' says Sheen heatedly, hunched over
some melting frozen yogurt in a mess tent on location in downtown Los
Angeles. The show has set up in a parking lot for a shoot at a
veterans' hall. It is Sheen's sixtieth birthday and he is wearing
a T-shirt that reads, 'What's Next?' -- the mantra of his
television character. Waxman moved on to Bradley Whitford, who plays Deputy Chief-of-Staff "Josh Lyman." She recounted: "Sheen is not the only rabidly
anti-Republican cast member. Listen to Whitford, who offhandedly
describes himself as 'a white-bread
pinko liberal.' Whitford is livid that during one of the primary
debates, Bush dared to name Jesus as the political philosopher
who has influenced him the most. To read the entire George magazine piece, go to: For how a Dr. Laura character was demonized on
the last episode, go to the October 19 CyberAlert which documented how
Martin Sheen as the President attacked her misleading "Dr."
title and sarcastically compared her claim that the Bible says
homosexuality is "an abomination" to how it advocates
slavery for his daughter and that his mother be burned. "You may
be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the ignorant tight-ass
club." Go to: For how Sheen would be "enormously
disappointed" if Bush won, but then hoped in that case his show
would be a "royal pain in the ass," as well as how he
described Bill Clinton as "terrific and heroic," go to:
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers: >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe >>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<< |