CyberAlert -- 11/24/2000 -- Pro-Gore Court Decision Hailed
Pro-Gore Court Decision Hailed; Standing O for Harris Distorted; Katherine "Cruella de Vil" Harris; Peggy Noonan for President?
-- ABC News. During an ABC News special report about
the ruling just before 10pm ET Tuesday night, November 21, ABC's Gore
beat reporter Terry Moran assured viewers: -- Boston Globe. In a November 22 front page "news analysis," Boston Globe Washington Bureau Chief David Shribman, a veteran of the Wall Street Journal reporting staff, celebrated the court's activist decision. "Every voice matters, the justices remind us," declared the headline over the piece in which he rejoiced at how the court decided the voters must be primary and "if that means counting every last ballot card, that is both the burden and the glory of democratic rule." Here's an excerpt of what Shribman contended: For drama and decisiveness, the moment had few equals. Late at night, with Thanksgiving nearing and with the political impasse moving into its third week, the Florida Supreme Court stepped into the election struggle, throwing the battle for the presidency into upheaval with the simple revolutionary thought that created the country two centuries ago and could eventually bring the 2000 campaign to an end: The merest individual voice matters. Huge political armies continue to clash in the capital and in Florida, but the decision of the state's highest court seeks to assure that the relatively few anonymous voters whose views were missed by machine count -- but whose intent may be discerned by the human eye -- will be considered in the final count. In the hands of those anonymous few rest the destinies of Governor George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore.... The theory behind the court's action was clear, and was anything but the sterile product of an isolated court. Ruling in the most fevered political atmosphere of the age, with control of the White House in the balance, the court gave every indication of having followed this dispute and all of its curious, even maddening, turns. In that context, it said that a political campaign so close that the margins were microscopic must ultimately be decided the way even the most lopsided elections are decided, by the voters. And, the court ruled, if that means counting every last ballot card, that is both the burden and the glory of democratic rule. The court established that, as great as the institutions of government are, the individual is greater still, and his or her voice must be heard -- and counted. And so the counting will go on, through the holiday weekend. No presidential election in modern times has lasted so long, or prompted so many legal battles, or rewarded and then punished the participants with such swiftness. But, then again, no election has so unambiguously affirmed the founding principles of the nation, especially the primacy, the prerogatives and, ultimately, the power of the individual. END Excerpt To read Shribman's entire "news
analysis," go to:
In my absence from the MRC on Wednesday, Rich Noyes
rewound a tape a few hours to track down the early morning blast:
To read it online with an accompanying
RealPlayer video clip posted by MRC Webmaster Andy Szul, go to: To see the Media Reality Check in the format in
which it was distributed by fax, access the Adobe Acrobat PDF version: Here's the text of the November 22 report: ABC'S DIANE SAWYER CAN'T SPOT NON-VOTES, BUT PRAISES THOSE WHO CAN FLORIDA DIMPLE-SPOTTERS ARE DOING "PHENOMENAL WORK" Racing through the numerical options for a Gore victory this morning, ABC's Political Analyst George Stephanopoulos announced on Wednesday's Good Morning America that his Democratic sources estimate that if a "looser standard" of counting votes is allowed in Florida, Al Gore would finally achieve a lead of a couple of hundred votes. How loose is loose? The Democrats want "dimpled" ballots, or punch cards that have been neither punched nor perforated but which have a barely-detectable dent near what would be the right hole, added to Gore's count so that he, not Bush, would be President. After Stephanopoulos's arithmetic display, viewers saw co-host Diane Sawyer hold up a punch card ballot that she said was dimpled. "I'm holding this because I've been obsessed with what it is to see an actual ballot with a dimple in it and it is a very subtle thing," Sawyer said. "And we, I don't think, I've been putting flashlights through it," at which point she aimed a flashlight beam through the paper, revealing no obvious holes or marks. "I'm telling you the people doing this work are really doing phenomenal work to see all of this and to take care over all of these," she added. Her co-host, Charles Gibson, remarked that "It's just a slight indentation in that in that uh, in that card." Sawyer hastened to add that "If you didn't see it [the dimple] at home that's because it's really hard for you to see." Gibson agreed: "And they're not hitting it with a pen so that you see an ink point, they're hitting it with a stylus so you just have to look for an indentation." Sawyer: "That's right." Moments later, when Gibson interviewed Gore chief William Daley, he failed to challenge him to defend the Gore camp's insistence that such unreliable marks be counted as votes. Instead, he tossed a softball about last night's ruling from the Florida Supreme Court: "Did you expect this much of a victory from the court?" END Reprint of Media Reality Check "Quick Take"
In the November 22 segment with Katie Couric,
Alter asserted: "I also think
that Gore scored on the PR front by suggesting again that the two men
meet. You got financial markets that are getting jittery. The American
public is getting concerned about this." More like the Bush campaign should trust no one in the media.
But Tuesday night, the MRC's Tim Graham and Brian Boyd determined for me, the NBC Nightly News didn't show the event while on the November 21 CBS Evening News Byron Pitts asserted that only "state Republicans" gave her "a hero's welcome." ABC's Peter Jennings acknowledged she "got a standing ovation in the legislature today from members of both parties," but he dismissed any affirmation of her work, attributing it to "perhaps having to do with state pride." -- CBS Evening News. Over video of the standing ovation, Byron Pitts reported: "Today the only public judgment came from state Republicans as they gave Secretary of State Harris a hero's welcome, she's the one player most often vilified by Democrats." -- ABC's World News Tonight allowed viewers to hear the applause as anchor Peter Jennings explained: "Just one other note from Tallahassee. Perhaps having to do with state pride, the Florida Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, got a standing ovation in the legislature today from members of both parties. She was there for the swearing-in of new legislators."
The Washington Post Ombudsman this week denounced a reporter for issuing a personal attack on Harris. Fashion reporter Robin Givhan had denigrated Harris: "One wonders how this Republican woman, who can't even use restraint when she's wielding a mascara wand, will manage to use it and make sound decisions in this game of partisan one-upmanship." -- Margaret Carlson in the November 27 Time. On
a page which included Harris's head, with deranged red cartoon eyes,
posted on the cartoon of Cruella DeVil, Carlson opined: As Tim Graham pointed out, Harris is not a "political appointee," but a public servant elected through the "will of the people." After detailing Republican jokes about hand
counting, Carlson rebutted: To read Carlson's complete diatribe, go to: -- Washington Post. In his inaugural column, new Post Ombudsman Michael Getler on Wednesday criticized the personal nature of an attack on Harris by a Post reporter. An excerpt of his November 22 column, titled "Mascara Smear." "At this moment that so desperately needs diplomacy, understatement and calm, one wonders how this Republican woman, who can't even use restraint when she's wielding a mascara wand, will manage to use it and make sound decisions in this game of partisan one-upmanship." That sentence appeared on the front page of the Style section last Saturday in an article by Post fashion reporter Robin Givhan about Florida's secretary of state, Katherine Harris. I would paraphrase that sentence: "At this moment that so desperately needs diplomacy, understatement and calm, one wonders" how The Post could publish such a slashing attack on the personal appearance of a woman who has been an important figure in the electoral stalemate. In case you missed it, here are excerpts from what Ms. Givhan told us about Ms. Harris: "Her skin had been plastered and powdered to the texture of pre-war walls....[S]he looked as if she were wearing a mask....The American public doesn't like falsehoods, and Harris is clearly presenting herself in a fake manner....Why should anyone trust her?" Ms. Givhan's treatment of Ms. Harris, in the view many Post readers -- including the ombudsman -- was a classic example of the arrogance of journalists that undermines people's confidence in the media. During this extraordinary period, The Post has been bombarded by e-mails and phone calls about alleged bias. Mostly, callers express partisan opinions without citing specific stories. But the Harris article produced a different and, in my view, more serious, specific and useful reaction for the paper to ponder. Mocking someone's appearance is not something that newspapers should do.... Eugene Robinson, Style editor, says he had no idea the story would provoke the reaction it did. "Part of what a Style section ought to do is kick up a bunch of dust from time to time. But just because there is a big reaction to this story doesn't mean that we wanted this....Maybe we were a little deaf to the tone in this case," he says.... The stakes for The Post on a story such as this are high. Its reporting and analysis of the presidential standoff have lived up to the paper's well-earned reputation for top-notch coverage. Yet that reputation can get tarnished by such a high-readability story that can add fuel to those who believe, or suspect, that the paper is inherently biased. END Excerpt To read Getler's entire piece, including a
defense from Givhan, go to:
-- Economic Freedom Is Overlooked Concept At Broadcast Networks To read the whole article, go to: -- Kudos...to U.S. News & World Report To read the rest of the article, go to:
MRC entertainment analyst Tom Johnson alerted
CyberAlert to the comments made during ABC's Monday Night Football
game this week. Returning from an ad break during the 4th quarter, the
ABC camera focused on a poster urging people to vote which featured a
picture ABC football commentator Dennis Miller and proclaimed:
"Dennis, You Decide." Miller commented: "Well, if
it's up to me I'd pick Peggy Noonan." Too bad Al Michaels isn't in contention to anchor World News Tonight. Reading the Wall Street Journal editorial page is probably a practice few at ABC News follow. -- Brent Baker
>>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers: >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe >>>You
can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by
subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday
afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org.
Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<< |