Those Cheapened Pulitzer 'Prizes'
Once upon a time, it meant something for a reporter to be called a
“Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist.” The prestige of this designation is
quickly eroding. The 2012 Pulitzer Prizes looked lesslike an
excellence-in-media competition and more like an exercise in leftist
self-affirmation. No prize established this more strongly than the
coveted National Reporting prize going to...The Huffington Post.
The Pulitzer judges who would rather swallow rat poison than give an
award to a conservative outlet like The Washington Times are bestowing
kudos on a site that thrives on celebrity dreck like “Miley Shows Off
Legs in Lacy Shorts” and “Kim Wears Kanye’s Initials on Her Ears.”
The
prize winner, “senior military correspondent” David Wood, has been at
The Huffington Post for about a year. He won the Pulitzer by reporting
on the struggles of veterans and their families. It’s a worthy subject,
but also something pretty much every other media outlet has tried to
cover over the last ten years. There’s nothing here worthy of a National
Reporting prize.
What the Pulitzer Prize judges are doing is exactly what the Obama
White House did right from the start – mainstreaming the Huffington
Post. Obama took questions in a press conference from Huff-Post
political reporter Sam Stein to add prestige to Arianna Huffington’s
liberal imitation of the Drudge Report. A Pulitzer seals the liberal
deal.
The website congratulated itself with a quote from Rem Rieder, editor
of the American Journalism Review. “I think it's very healthy to see the
Pulitzers have moved, albeit slowly, from a solely print focus," Rieder
said. "The world has changed dramatically. There's an awful lot of
exciting developments with digital news operations."
But they also quoted leftist professor Jay Rosen oozing about how “Old
Media” and “New Media” are now meaningless terms. So now heavily
opinionated and oftentimes downright sloppy liberal reporting –
commentary, really – from the Huffington Post and Politico (which won
the editorial cartooning prize) can be defined as part of the
Establishment.
The Pulitzer judges even bestowed an imprimatur on The Stranger, a
Seattle alternative weekly rag edited for six years by radical sex
columnist Dan Savage. Eli Sanders won the Feature Writing category for a
story on a horrific local double-rape of two lesbians, one of whom was
stabbed to death.
The Stranger staff’s reaction to the Pulitzer wasn’t solemn. Big
surprise, that. Their website quickly added “Winner of the Pulitzer
Prize” like a slogan and asked on their blog, “Hey, Eli: Is that a
Pulitzer Prize in your pocket, or are you just happy to see us?” Unless I
miss my guess, this is the first Pulitzer Prize for a newspaper that
also operates an annual home-video pornography competition (called the
Hump! Festival).
The liberal tilt carried over to the book prizes. The History prize was
awarded to the late radical Manning Marable for a biography of Malcolm
X. Marable’s other works include “How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black
America” and “Speaking Truth to Power: Essays on Race, Resistance, and
Radicalism.” Guess where he fell on the spectrum – if he was even on it.
In his last book, Marable complained that Malcolm’s autobiography was
mangled by that “liberal Republican” Alex Haley and became a work in
“the tradition of Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography” rather than “a
manifesto for black insurrection,” which Marable desired.
The General Nonfiction prize went to Stephen Greenblatt at Harvard for
“The Swerve: How the World Became Modern.” Greenblatt tells the tale of a
book hunter named Poggio Braccolini and how he preserved the work of
the atheist Roman poet Lucretius, a poem called “On The Nature of
Things.”
The Pulitzer website oozed that Lucretius wrote “a beautiful poem of
the most dangerous ideas: that the universe functioned without the aid
of gods, that religious fear was damaging to human life.” The priest and
scholar Father Robert Barron, a fan of Greenblatt’s previous book on
Shakespeare, found this book’s anti-religion, anti-Catholic thesis not
only incorrect, but exasperating. “Modernity emerged out of a long
twilight struggle with a supreme enemy...Roman Catholicism! This is one
of the great myths of the secular academy.”
The Pulitzer juries are just like other liberal media collectives.
Marable’s book made the Top Ten Books of 2011 at The New York Times.
Greenblatt’s book was celebrated twice by National Public Radio (the
book critic said it made her “shiver” as she read it).
It’s amazing that liberals have cartooned conservative thinkers as
locked in a bubble or an echo chamber. These cheapened “prizes” expose
the airless insularity of today’s leftist journalism.
