Obama-led U.S. Fights Cuba and Is Losing
You used to have to wait every four years to see nations duke it out during the Olympics, excepting the occasional border tiff or war. Today we’re watching two nations and two economic systems fight right on the front pages of
In this corner in the surprising red, white and blue trunks, at a spry 84 years of age, he’s 6’4” and weighing in at 193 pounds, we have El Supremo, the one-time Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. And in this corner in the red trunks, at 6’1” and weighing a svelte 180 pounds, the current champion of the
The two big-name fighters are taking surprising stances. Long-time commie Castro came out and said that system wasn’t working for his country. Though he since said he was misinterpreted, his nation is still letting go 500,000 to 1 million state workers and boosting the free market.
At the same time, the most powerful nation in the free world is headed by someone who believes government solutions are the best. Obama has helped the
With
All across the
Americans are fighting mad, and no wonder. Since the Cuban Missile Crisis, they’ve have never really taken
The New York Times quoted the Cuban Workers’ Central, “the country’s only recognized labor federation,” defending the huge layoff. But here’s the best part, look at their reasoning: “‘Our state cannot and should not continue supporting companies’ and other state entities, ‘with inflated payrolls, losses that damage the economy, which are counterproductive, generate bad habits and deform the workers’ conduct.’”
The left-wing union in the hemisphere’s only communist country just said they can’t support high payrolls and businesses that lose so much they hurt the economy. Yet here in the
Take a look at the auto takeover, so loved by the media. Remember Time magazine’s cover story “The Case for Saving Detroit?” Or Time Managing Editor Richard Stengel claiming the industry is “too big to fail?” BusinessWeek took the same position and complained Republicans “may keep the
Of course, that help was a payoff to the unions that funded the Democrat’s 2008 victory (giving somewhere between $80 million and $450 million, depending on the news outlet you choose). Either way, it sounds more like old-time
Take that quote, replace
Voters have watched