Disgraced Reuters [1]freelance photographer Adnan Hajj was dismissed by the wire service for altering a photograph of a Lebanese skyline to make the damage caused by Israel look worse (big hat tip to Charles Johnston at Little Green Footballs [2], who first uncovered the fake photo). More photos by Hajj are being scrutinized, and at least one other photo [3]has been proven to have been digitally altered.
But before his disgrace, Hajj made the front page, above-the-fold of Saturday's New York Times with a photo [4]of what the picture caption claims is a "wounded civilian" (but with Hajj we can no longer be sure).
The Times has used him in the past [5]as well.
Now the question is: Will the Times check the validity of previous work by Hajj that has appeared within its pages?
