There was some "far"-out labeling bias at the top of Monday's "news analysis" by Helene Cooper and Mark Landler, "Experts Wonder About U.S. Role in Haiti After the Cameras Leave [1]." The Times tried to stanch the criticism of Obama by sticking a radioactive ideological label on it:
President Obama's aggressive response to the deadly earthquake in Haiti has led to criticism from the far right that the United States is taking on too much, at a time when its foreign-policy plate is already full.
The Times later hinted at who the "far right" is - "conservative commentators" like Glenn Beck:
Some Haiti experts say that despite the criticism from conservative commentators - Glenn Beck complained that Mr. Obama spent more time reacting to the Haiti earthquake than he did to the attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack - the heart-rending tragedy in Haiti may make it impossible for the United States to ignore it once the news media attention goes away.
You'd have been hard-pressed to find the Times highlighting Bush anti-war critics as hailing from "the far left."