Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler of
News of Nadler's plan to introduce the Respect for Marriage Act broke late last week, but ABC, CBS and NBC all failed to report this latest push for forced acceptance of same-sex marriage. Although the health care reform debate has gobbled up media attention for weeks, the networks' silence on the fundamental issue of how the federal government defines marriage is odd.
Nadler's bill would overturn the 1996 law signed by President Bill Clinton that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman.
A September 15 press release issued by Nadler's office claimed the bill has 91 original co-sponsors. Nadler stated in the release, “With a President who is committed to repealing DOMA and a broad, diverse coalition of Americans on our side, we now have a real opportunity to remove from the books this obnoxious and ugly law.”
Not all Democrats agreed with Nadler. The Washington Blade reported  on September 11 that Rep. Barney Frank, an openly gay Democrat from
ABC, CBS and NBC failed to take interest in the story, even with the added twist of intra-party (and even intra-administration) division over the bill. None of the networks have discussed this issue since President Obama's inauguration, despite his repeated calls  during the 2008 campaign to repeal DOMA and despite a 54-page brief  filed in support of DOMA by his Justice Department in June.
The brief, filed in the
Importance of DOMA
DOMA did not simply define marriage as a union between one man and one woman. It banned the federal recognition of same-sex marriages. It also protects states from being forced to recognize same-sex marriages that took place in other states.
“DOMA is the only federal law that protects marriage as the union of husband and wife, and guarantees voters in Georgia or Wisconsin that a handful of judges in Massachusetts will not be able to impose gay marriage on their state,” noted Maggie Gallagher, president and founder of the National Organization for Marriage.
Bryan Fischer, director of Issues Analysis for the American Family Association, focused his criticism of Nadler's efforts on the issue of states' rights.
“People in state after state have made it clear that they do not want either Congress or activist judges tampering with the time-honored institution of marriage,” he stated in a September 15 press release . “People who care about the institution of marriage and care about their own state's Tenth Amendment right to decide this issue for themselves should be outraged at this frontal assault on the cornerstone of American society and on the democratic process itself.”
Not Ignored in Print
While the networks have ignored DOMA, the editorial boards of The Washington Post and the New York Times urged the administration to overturn the law as soon as possible.
The Justice Department brief filed in June that supported DOMA inspired the Times' Frank Rich to write on June 28, “Obama's inaction on gay civil rights is striking. So is his utterly uncharacteristic inarticulateness. The Justice Department brief defending DOMA has spoken louder for this president than any of his own words on the subject.”
James Kirchick, assistant editor of the
The Washington Post's Jonathan Capehart gave Obama more cover in his June 21 editorial. “The first substantive comment on gay and lesbian equality since he took office was the Justice Department's noxious brief in Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer v United States of America, and it fueled suspicion that the president was backpedaling on his promises.” Capehart later urged gays and lesbians to look to Congress to achieve their “big victories, such as the repeal of DOMA and the 'don't ask don't tell' policy.”
On August 18, the Post reported that “the Obama administration distanced itself” from the Justice Department's June brief regarding DOMA.
A follow-up brief filed August 17 in the Smelt v.
DOMA, the administration's defense of it and the subsequent backing away from the defense, were not discussed on ABC, CBS, or NBC..
The networks habitually refused to cover DOMA-related news, as indicated by this year's lack of coverage and also their refusal to report  Speaker Nancy Pelosi's firm 2008 statement of support for the repeal of DOMA.
This of course, is not to say that the networks refuse to cover news related to gay rights. Networks promoted same-sex marriage through the constant airing  of Prop 8 protest footage in the days following the 2008 election.
ABC, CBS and NBC committed a grave disservice to the American public by refusing to cover the issue of DOMA. The repeal of such a law has serious implications for society and culture.
Networks repeatedly proved their liberal bias. But at least in that, viewers knew something occurred and had the opportunity to seek out supplemental information. In the case of DOMA, viewers most likely haven't realized the very definition of traditional marriage is at stake.
Like this article? Sign up for "Culture Links," CMI's weekly e-mail newsletter, on the right side of the CMI home page.