CyberAlert -- 11/28/2000 -- Gore's Claims Given Credibility

Gore's Claims Given Credibility; Another "Conservative" Judge; Morning Hosts Whined About Disenfranchised in Palm Beach

1) After Al Gore's Monday night address, ABC's Peter Jennings repeated his pronouncements about "wanting to respect the will of the voters," but the night before, after Bush spoke, Jennings stressed that though he may "technically" be President-elect, "this is certainly not over."

2) Al Gore claimed that Miami-Dade "election officials brought the count to a premature end in the face of organized intimidation." NBC Nightly News relayed the charge while ABC actually noted that "the election supervisor denied he felt threatened."

3) "Gore's lawyers claim Bush's 537 vote lead would vanish if all votes in these places were counted properly," declared CBS's Byron Pitts as the broadcast network evening shows treated Gore's contest efforts as a credible and reasonable effort.

4) Dan Rather promised "fair" reporting just before he asked a Gore lawyer about his route to victory while with a Bush lawyer Rather demanded he respond to the assumption Gore is "absolutely convinced" that most voted for him "and that the proof of that is how hard" the Bush team is fighting "to stop the counting."

5) The networks have found another "conservative" judge in Florida as both ABC and NBC agreed that's the ideology of the judge hearing the Gore election contest case.

6) Only NBC on Monday night gave voice to Democrats suggesting it may be time for Gore to concede. Robert Reich raised the idea on Monday's GMA, but World News Tonight didn't mention it.

7) An ABC News poll determined most think Al Gore should concede and that a big majority would consider Bush legitimately elected. Peter Jennings held off on citing the poll numbers until after the first ad break on World News Tonight.

8) ABC and NBC morning hosts whined to Bob Crawford about how unfair it was not to include Palm Beach County's late numbers. ABC's Charles Gibson: "Doesn't it disenfranchise voters in Palm Beach County not to take the results that they handed in?"

9) Judge Charles Burton wasn't too upset by his work not being counted as he blamed Democrats for delays. The Boston Globe revealed Burton once interned for Senator Ted Kennedy.

10) Bryant Gumbel raced to discredit members of the U.S. Supreme Court: "Five of the nine justices...came to the job during Bush Senior's watch, either as President or Vice President." Eleanor Clift charged Bush should be "ashamed" and recalled George Wallace in rebuking his criticism of the Florida Supreme Court.

>>> "Margaret's Flagrant Foul: Feminists find an enemy in the Endless Election." In the weekend piece, posted on the National Review Online site, the MRC's Tim Graham examined the political agenda of Time's Margaret Carlson: "Her solidarity with American womanhood is decidedly truncated, excluding all those working women who threaten a liberal utopia. For most of the Clinton years, Margaret has seen her feminist duty as throwing rose petals before the long march of her personal inspiration, Hillary Rodham Clinton....The zenith of Margaret's Hillary hagiography came in one of the most preposterous passages of the 1990s, in a 1993 Vanity Fair profile: 'Valentine's Day at the Red Sage restaurant. Even at a romantic outing, the President can be the date from hell, talking to everyone but the girl he brung....Finally alone, they have 'painted soup' and the lamb baked in herbed bread. They exchange gifts and touch each other more in two hours than the Bushes did in four years.'" To read the whole article, go to:
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment112500a.shtml [1]<<<

1

After Al Gore addressed the nation Monday night, ABC's Peter Jennings and George Stephanopoulos repeated his pronouncements about "wanting to respect the will of the voters" and value the "integrity of democracy" as Stephanopoulos said Gore tried to "elevate the tone of the debate," but the night before, after George W. Bush's national address, Jennings stressed that though he may "technically" be President-elect, "this is certainly not over."

Monday night following Al Gore's 8:55pm ET remarks, Stephanopoulos summed up: "Well, we heard this repeat of the brief 'every vote has to count,' the votes have been 'incomplete and inaccurate.' What struck me though is it was a kind of an ode to the voting process and I think he was trying to elevate the tone of the debate."
Peter Jennings agreed: "He said it a couple of times earlier today, wanting to respect the will of the voters and that the 'integrity of democracy' was here at stake."
Stephanopoulos echoed the spin: "Ignoring votes is ignoring democracy. You'll hear that again and again in the coming days."

But Sunday night, after Bush's short 9:30pm ET speech, the MRC's Tim Graham noticed how Jennings emphasized how uncertain the race remained as he undermined the import of Bush's message: "Governor George W. Bush of Texas speaking from the state capital of Austin, giving the brief remarks of a man who unquestionably believes he is the President-elect. If by chance, you joined us late, you may not know that the Secretary of State in Florida today certified the election results for that state, even though in some respects they were not fully complete. Palm Beach County, one of the most contested counties in the state, did not fulfill or did not finish its complete count on time, and so the Secretary of State chose the election numbers from November the 14th, the time she tried to certify the election once before. So though Governor Bush quotes Thomas Jefferson and says every difference of opinion is not necessarily a difference of principle, names a transition team led by Dick Cheney, names Andy Card to be a chief of staff and says he wants to open a transition office and work with President Clinton, this is certainly not over. There are, there is a raft of legal challenges both in Florida, at the appeals court in Atlanta, and at the Supreme Court of the United States which are going to have to be dealt with in some fashion in the week ahead."

Stephanopoulos praised Bush's tactics: "He also did something else very smart. He raised a question whether Al Gore would actually go ahead with these contests, actually called on Vice President Gore to cease and desist. Now will Vice President Gore agree to that? Absolutely not. But by creating some uncertainty tonight, it makes him a more certain President-elect."
Jennings responded: "There is no doubt whatsoever that Al Gore is going to contest this in every possible way....So, another phase in the presidential war, and it is still very much a war, as you will see when you get up tomorrow and see the election challenges filed in Florida and a variety of other places as well. But there it is, speaking as President-elect tonight, which he is technically. On our election map, we now say that Florida has been certified, and therefore won by Mr. Bush. It may yet change."

2

Miami-Dade officials "intimidated" by a raging GOP mob? During his Monday night remarks, Al Gore asserted as fact: "In one county, election officials brought the count to a premature end in the face of organized intimidation."

None of the broadcast networks mentioned the claim in their brief post address coverage. During their earlier evening newscasts CBS didn't mention the charge, NBC relayed it while ABC actually noted that "the election supervisor denied he felt threatened."

After Gore finished Monday night, Dan Rather wrapped up a CBS News special report by simply repeating Gore's spin: "Vice President Al Gore in Washington saying that many thousands of votes that were cast on election day have not yet been counted. He also said this is America, when votes are cast they are counted here."

On the November 27 NBC Nightly News, David Bloom asserted without any supporting evidence: "In court papers filed this afternoon, Gore's lawyers contend that in three Florida counties -- Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Nassau, quote, 'the vote totals are wrong.' Gore arguing that he would have picked up an additional 600 votes in Miami-Dade if that county had not illegally stopped its manual recount of 10,000 disputed ballots, Gore's team blaming that controversial decision on quote, 'a campaign of personal attacks' launched by Bush supporters."

But on ABC's World News Tonight while reporter Bill Redeker repeated the Gore charge that election officials in Miami-Dade County "were intimidated by Republican demonstrators," he added that "today the election supervisor denied he felt threatened."
Viewers then saw this soundbite from David Leahy: "From their perspective I can understand where they might have thought we were intimidated and our vote was based on that intimidation. But the fact is that it wasn't. I simply made my decision based on the fact that we could not certify in time."

3

The broadcast network evening shows treated Al Gore's contest case as a credible and reasonable effort worthy of respectful coverage. All three evening shows ran through the Gore team's claims about undercounts and missed counts as ABC's World News Tonight led with three stories in a row on Gore's various lawsuits. NBC Nightly News devoted a whole story to the Gore vote capturing dream numbers. CBS's Byron Pitts added up the Gore claims and concluded: "By the Democrats' math, Al Gore should have finished at least 1,288 votes ahead of George W. Bush."

Dan Rather opened the November 27 CBS Evening News by giving equal weight to the claims of both candidates, though only Bush was certified the winner the night before:
"The battle moved into a new phase today. Believing he is now President-elect, and claiming to be, Texas Governor George Bush kicked his transition team into high gear. But Vice President Al Gore said, not so fast. He is challenging the election on the basis that there are thousands of votes that have never been counted and he will address the nation this evening to explain why he is in the courts to contest the certification."

Byron Pitts later delivered, without contradictory information, the Gore case: "Gore's lawyers claim Bush's 537 vote lead would vanish if all votes in these places were counted properly. The manual recount in Palm Beach rejected by the Secretary of State would net Gore 215 votes, a partial recount in Miami-Dade would give Gore another 160 votes. In Nassau County the Gore campaign claims 50 votes for the Vice President were discounted illegally. Even more significant, they argue, approximately 4,000 contested ballots were never counted in Palm Beach. There the Gore campaign estimates a net gain of 800 votes. And the 9,000 ballots never recounted in Miami-Dade. Here a net gain of 600 votes. By the Democrats' math, Al Gore should have finished at least 1,288 votes ahead of George W. Bush."

Over on the NBC Nightly News, Jim Avila detailed, without considering any dubiousness, the Gore claims. Avila reported, as transcribed by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth:
"From recounts to courtrooms across Florida, today the Gore campaign focuses on three counties in a desperate effort to find 538 votes -- enough to win the state and the presidency. First stop, Nassau County, northeast corner of the state, 51 votes on the line here. In dispute, the election board's abrupt decision to file the first machine recount results rather than the subsequent hand recount that gave Gore more votes."
Shirley King, Nassau County Supervisor of Elections: "Every vote counts, so why not go back and count them?"
Avila: "Next, Palm Beach, 210 votes immediately at stake. In dispute, the election board missed the Secretary of State's deadline. The machine original recount was certified, costing the Vice President votes. And finally, and most important, Miami-Dade. Two issues here. First, 157 new Gore votes tallied before the recount was suspended and never added to the Gore column. And then the big prize, 10,000 uncounted disputed ballots. These are the punch cards on which machines found no presidential votes. They've not been counted by hand."
Prof. Lance DeHaven Smith, Florida State University: "The presidential election for the year 2000 hinges on whether the manual recount is required in Miami-Dade County or not."
Avila: "Miami-Dade not a huge overall margin for Gore here -- 53-46. But experts say in a recount Democrats frequently collect the majority of disputed votes."
Smith: "The Democrats tend to be the people that are making these errors, and I think that's probably so because the Democrats tend to be older. Sometimes they're sporadic voters."
Avila concluded: "So how do the numbers add up? Al Gore has a 537 certified vote lead to overcome. If he wins his case in Nassau County, the Bush lead shrinks to 486. If Gore wins his case in Palm Beach, the Bush lead shrinks again to 276. If he wins in Miami-Dade, the Bush lead shrinks to 119. Not enough votes for Gore unless the courts rule his way down the line. A political struggle in both the courtroom and the counting room the Democrats hope will overturn the Florida certified vote and leave Al Gore President."

4

Whenever Dan Rather goes out of his way to promise "fair" and "accurate" reporting you know bias is coming. Monday night, after just such an assurance, he ran back-to-back interviews with Gore lawyer David Boies and Bush lawyer Ben Ginsberg. With Boies, he concentrated on the route Boies sees to victory, but with Ginsberg Rather demanded he respond to the supposition Gore is contesting the election "because he is absolutely convinced" that most Floridians voted for him "and that the proof of that is how hard" the Bush team is fighting "to stop the counting."

Rather set up the November 27 CBS Evening News segment: "In an effort to bring you more fair, accurate clarity, with insight into the historic court cases, I talked late today with two of the key attorneys mapping the strategy for their respective sides. First, David Boies from the Gore campaign.

Rather's inquiries to Boies, as taken down by MRC analyst Brad Wilmouth:
-- "Stretch out for me a course in which Al Gore could wind up getting Florida's electoral votes. To a lot of people, it looks impossible at this juncture."
-- "How does he get from where he is, Vice President Gore, to a winning posture in Florida?"
-- "Is it your expectation in your heart of hearts that Al Gore will win this eventually?"

Rather moved on to an excerpt of a second interview: "I also spoke very late in the day with a key legal strategist for the Bush campaign, attorney Ben Ginsberg." Rather's two questions for Ginsberg:
-- "What's the most important thing for the American people to know right now?"
-- "What about the argument, which I'm sure you've heard, that Vice President Gore is continuing to contest the election because he is absolutely convinced that more Floridians went to the polls to vote for him than did for George Bush and that the proof of that is how hard you and others are fighting on behalf of George Bush to stop the counting?"

5

The networks have found another "conservative" judge in Florida as both ABC and NBC agreed that's the ideology of the judge hearing the Gore election contest case. As you may remember, to use a Peter Jennings phrase, the Friday before the Florida Supreme Court issued its activist ruling, Jennings assured November 17 World News Tonight viewers: "There are seven justices. Six were appointed by Democratic Governors. Our legal analyst in Florida tells us that only one of the judges is considered to be a liberal, the rest are regarded as moderate to conservative."

Fast forward ten days to November 27. ABC reporter Erin Hayes asserted on World News Tonight that the Leon County judge who will decide the Gore election contest case, Sander Sauls, has been "on the bench for nearly twenty years, conservative, seen by many as slow and methodical, he was demoted from a chief judge position." Hayes added: "Once a Republican, Sauls is now a Democrat with connections likely to raise questions. On a list of his personal references handed out by the court, the name Dexter Douglass, a lead attorney arguing this case for Vice President Gore."

NBC's Dan Abrams offered a matching label on the NBC Nightly News: "His friends describe him as the perfect judge for the case. He's 59-years-old, he's a graduate of the University of Florida Law School, he was appointed to the bench in 1989 by Republican Governor Bob Martinez, even though he's now a registered Democrat. Those who've argued before him describe him as conservative for this court."

Nice caveat.

6

Only NBC on Monday night gave voice to any Democrats suggesting it may be time for Gore to concede. Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich raised the idea on Monday's Good Morning America, but World News Tonight didn't mention it.

David Bloom, however, did pick up on it on the NBC Nightly News: "But already some Democrats are questioning just how long Gore should fight."
Senator Robert Toricelli: "The country has to get on with its life and the country needs a President."
Robert Reich: "Al Gore would be a far better President than George W. Bush. But at some point you've got to say enough is enough."

7

An ABC News poll determined most think Al Gore should concede and that a big majority would consider Bush legitimately elected, but Peter Jennings held off on citing the poll numbers until after the first ad break on World News Tonight.

On Monday's show Jennings relayed the findings of a post-certification ABC News/Washington Post poll: "We found that 60 percent of Americans think that Al Gore should concede the election now, but only 40 percent think he should do so because the vote count was fair. 17 percent simply want this to be over with. 76 percent of Americans told us they would consider Mr. Bush legitimately elected if he eventually assumes office."

Brit Hume highlighted on FNC's Special report with Brit Hume Zogby poll numbers about how more fear Gore than Bush will steal the election: "John Zogby, one of the few pollsters who picked up the late swing toward Gore before Election Day, has picked up another swing that will be much less welcome to the Vice President. A Zogby poll found that 60 percent think that if Gore ends up winning, he stole the election. Only 21 percent feel he will be legitimate. By contrast 47 percent feel that if Bush wins, he will be legitimate, with only 30 percent believing he stole the election."

8

ABC and NBC morning hosts whined to Bob Crawford about how unfair it was not to include Palm Beach County's hand count numbers in the certified numbers even though they missed the court imposed deadline which gave them an additional week and a half beyond the statutory filing date.

"Mr. Crawford," pleaded ABC's Charles Gibson, "why did you decide not to give Palm Beach County the extra time, the just couple of extra hours that it asked for to finish its count?" Gibson proposed: "But doesn't it disenfranchise voters in Palm Beach County not to take the results that they handed in?" NBC's Katie Couric seemed baffled: "I'm not quite sure what the rationale was for not extending the deadline?....So how would the inclusion of these numbers in Palm Beach compromise the integrity of the process?"

On ABC's Good Morning America on Monday morning, co-host Charles Gibson, MRC analyst Jessica Anderson noticed, grilled Florida Canvassing Board member Bob Crawford:
-- "Do you feel confident that you certified last night the person who got the most votes in the state of Florida, or just the most votes within the deadline?"
-- "So there's no doubt in your mind that George Bush got the most votes in the state of Florida?"
-- "But Mr. Klain, the attorney for Al Gore, said just a few moments ago on this air, look, there are some votes that haven't been counted once, the undercount votes in Miami-Dade."
-- "Mr. Crawford, why did you decide not to give Palm Beach County the extra time, the just couple of extra hours that it asked for to finish its count, and then decide to throw out their partial recount? I mean, after all, the judge had said the votes could come in at 5 p.m. Sunday or 9 a.m. Monday."
-- "But doesn't it disenfranchise voters in Palm Beach County not to take the results that they handed in?"
Crawford explained: "Not really, Charlie. What Palm Beach County did, they knew the deadline was coming. They sent in a certified vote and they had two things they sent us. They sent us a certified vote of the machine recount, which we already had, then they also sent us a partial manual recount. Had we taken the partial manual recount, Al Gore would have been 15,000 votes short because it was not a complete count and there's no way we could have pieced that back together. So we took the only complete vote we had, required under the law, and we certified that, and that's the result that we had."

On NBC's Today, Crawford received a similarly tough reception from Katie Couric who was upset by the lack of inclusion of the late numbers, MRC analyst Geoffrey Dickens observed. Her argumentative questions:
-- "When we last spoke you claimed that your aim was to quote, 'produce an election in Florida that the state and country can believe is credible.' Do you think you've have accomplished that?"
-- "Let's talk about Palm Beach County if we could for a moment, Mr. Crawford. As you know that county was denied an extension and submitted its recount results at 7:08pm, two hours and eight minutes after the deadline. Now they netted, apparently, about 200 votes for Gore but those votes were not included in the final tally. Why wasn't that deadline extended to accommodate the Palm Beach recount? I know that you met with Katherine Harris and Clay Roberts? What was the thinking behind that decision?"
-- "But that was the only choice you had if you were...if you didn't extend the deadline. I'm not quite sure what the rationale was for not extending the deadline?"
-- "I was just going to read what the Supreme Court ruling also said. 'Because the right to vote is the preeminent right and the declaration of rights of the Florida Constitution the circumstances under which the Secretary may exercise her authority to ignore a county's returns filed after the initial statutory date are limited. The Secretary may ignore such results only if their inclusion will compromise the integrity of the electoral process.' So how would the inclusion of these numbers in Palm Beach compromise the integrity of the process?"

9

Palm Beach County judge Charles Burton wasn't too upset by his work not being counted as he blamed Democrats for delaying the process, a point not picked up on by the networks Monday night. And the Boston Globe revealed Burton once interned for Senator Ted Kennedy.

ABC's Charles Gibson opened Monday's Good Morning America by previewing how "we're going to talk to the Chairman of Palm Beach County's Canvassing Board in an exclusive interview, and he is pretty angry."

Actually, MRC analyst Jessica Anderson observed, he was resigned to reality. After pressing Bob Crawford, Gibson returned to Burton, whom he'd interviewed earlier: "I just want to go back to Judge Charles Burton, who ran that canvassing board in Palm Beach County, for a reaction. What do you basically feel about Katherine Harris and that board, that they turned down your extra votes?"
Burton explained: "I think quite honestly the truthful answer is they could have waited and they could have said, 'We'll give you an extra couple of hours,' but you know, as he [Crawford] pointed out, it certainly wouldn't have changed the outcome. I think there's a couple of important things, though, Charlie. I mean, going into this we felt that whatever standard we came up with and however we reviewed these ballots, it had to fair, it had to be geared towards achieving a fair result, not geared towards achieving a certain result. And you know one thing I want to mention, when all is said and done, I mean, the Democratic Party, the Republican Party, everybody agreed to the standard we had applied in reviewing these ballots, and it was only after about four days into it that the Democratic Party went back to court to try and, you know, basically have us change that standard because I guess they realized they weren't getting enough votes."

That demand kept him in court for half of last Wednesday.

"Newton Native Kept Cool in Drama" read the headline over a November 27 Boston Globe story which revealed a fresh tidbit about Burton's resume. Reporter Lynda Gorov disclosed:
"Burton, the canvassing board chairman on whose every decision the presidency, in part, hung in recent weeks, is another Florida transplant. Growing up, home was Newton. College was Suffolk University. He even interned for U.S. Senator Edward M. Kennedy."

Burton certainly acted a lot less partisan than does his mentor.

10

Bryant Gumbel beat Democratic spinners in the race to be the first to discredit members of the U.S. Supreme Court because they were nominated by either the Reagan-Bush or Bush administration.

On Monday's The Early Show on CBS, MRC analyst Brian Boyd noticed, Gumbel asked law professor Jonathan Turley: "Five of the nine justices on the Supreme Court came to the job during Bush Senior's watch, either as President or Vice President. Is it insulting to even talk of the politics entering into this?"

Newsweek's Eleanor Clift dismissed any such concerns on the McLaughlin Group over the weekend as she equated George W. Bush with George Wallace:
"And the way that Governor Bush trashed the Florida Supreme Court. He ought to be ashamed. I haven't heard that kind of language since George Wallace and Richard Nixon. And frankly if the U.S. Supreme Court now hears this case, seven judges on the Supreme Court were appointed by Republicans. Does that mean that I think they don't have the country's interest at heart and that they're tools of the Republican Party? No, I don't!"

Let's see what she thinks after they decide. -- Brent Baker [2]

>>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate [3]

>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com [4]. Or, you can go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters [5]. Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com." After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4].
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4].

>>>You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4]. Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters [5].<<<