ACLU

Times Doubts "Angry" Clarence Thomas Can Be Impartial

10/5/2007 11:12 AM ET
Clarence Thomas's "anger" over his confirmation means he can't judge ACLU cases objectively - but former ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg can?

Obscene Material -- Hard-Core Porn -- Is Not Constitutionally Protected Speech

4/13/2007 12:00 AM ET
While the ACLU and liberal judges have managed to create a body of distorted case law in which soft-core porn has legal protection, the hardcore stuff found in adult stores does not. Hard-core ...

War on Christmas? Bah, Humbug.

12/12/2006 12:46 PM ET
The media are turning a blind eye to one of our most important cultural and Constitutional conflicts.

"Civil Liberties Groups" (Like the ACLU?) Fight "Tough New Immigration Law"

9/5/2006 1:09 PM ET
The Times stacks the deck with flattering labels for liberal activists.
Syndicate content