ClarenceThomas

Sonia Sotomayor Has a "Compelling Life Story" - But Clarence Thomas Didn't?

5/28/2009 12:39 PM ET
Double standards in the treatment of two Supreme Court nominees, one conservative, the other liberal, who rose from hardship.

NY Times: Sotomayor Has a 'Compelling Life Story,' But Clarence Thomas Didn't in 1991

5/28/2009 12:05 PM ET
Judge Sonia Sotomayor and Judge Clarence Thomas both had compelling life stories when they were nominated for the Supreme Court. But only Sotomayor's story has been celebrated that way by the New ...

Washington Post Displays Labeling Bias Over Recent Supreme Court Picks

5/27/2009 5:15 PM ET
The Washington Post front page for May 27 announces the Sonia Sotomayor nomination with this large headline: "First Latina Picked for Supreme Court; GOP Faces Delicate Task in Opposition." There's ...

Stressing Sotomayor's Life, Not Her Liberalism

5/27/2009 1:07 PM ET
ABC, CBS and NBC Toast 'Amazing' and 'Incredible' Court Nominee, Leave Labeling to 'Conservatives'

"Gruff...Rambling" Conservative Justice Thomas vs. "Energetic...Precise" Ginsburg

4/16/2009 2:39 PM ET
Unbalanced views of public appearances by two Supreme Court justices, one conservative, the other liberal.

Did "Hyperpartisan" Era Really Begin With Clinton's Impeachment?

12/15/2008 3:05 PM ET
Peter Baker's partisanship timeline conveniently ignores the unfair treatment by liberals of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas.

Biden Stances on Busing, Drug Offenses Repackaged as Racial Controversies

9/18/2008 2:03 PM ET
Hitting Joe Biden from the left on two dubious "race" issues.

Bob Herbert Unleashed: "Arch-Conservative" Clarence Thomas's "Self-Hatred"

9/9/2008 12:40 PM ET
Mild-mannered columnist Bob Herbert lets the mask slip: "Self-hatred is a terrible thing. Just ask that arch-conservative Clarence Thomas."

Obama, Thomas and Liberal Bias

2/8/2008 1:00 AM ET
The media paint the Supreme Court Justice's autobiography as angry, but ignore the rage in the presidential candidate's autobiography.

Times Doubts "Angry" Clarence Thomas Can Be Impartial

10/5/2007 11:12 AM ET
Clarence Thomas's "anger" over his confirmation means he can't judge ACLU cases objectively - but former ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg can?
Syndicate content