CNN’s Stelter Claims Zakaria Plagiarism Charges Merely ‘Attribution Mistakes’
For the second time in two years, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria has been accused of plagiarism, for using other people’s words and claiming them to be his own, during his Fareed Zakaria GPS program.
Despite the seriousness of the charges leveled against Zakaria, CNN’s Brian Stelter did his best to protect his colleague during his Reliable Sources program on Sunday. The CNN host defended Zakaria from plagiarism charges and insisted that his program merely “made some attribution mistakes.”
The blog Our Bad Media accused Zakaria of plagiarism and Stelter claimed they were “waging a campaign against Zakaria, not just against his CNN work, but his columns and books, too. I believe that most of their claims about GPS, 26 total, do not hold up under close scrutiny. The closer you look, the less it looks like capital-P plagiarism.”
The CNN host continued to defend Zakaria and claimed there’s a “perception” problem regarding the plagiarism charges:
The perception is that, as Kelly McBride of the Poynter Institute told Politico, “It seems obvious that Fareed was overly reliant on his source material.” McBride called some of the examples low-level plagiarism. Politico reporter Dylan Byers likened them to misdemeanors. And here is an example. One of the "What in the World?" segments on GPS back in June appears to have lifted two sentences from an appeals court ruling without attribution.
In a handful of other cases, it seems like parts of Zakaria's segments were inspired by articles in The Economist, The New York Times, et cetera. It seems like he took raw material from the articles, reworded a bit of it, and then added his own insights. Again, what appear to be misdemeanors plucked from hundreds of episodes of GPS. But shows like GPS and this one strive for the highest standards.
The CNN host then suggested that the plagiarism charges against Zakaria were misplaced and anonymous producers for his GPS program were possibly to blame:
So this is the part where I wish I could tell Zakaria's side of the story. For instance, many TV scripts are written by producers. So did Zakaria write the questionable passages himself or did his producers? But Zakaria declined to camera for an interview with me. CNN’s P.R. people have also declined to comment, other than to say that “CNN has the highest confidence in the excellence and integrity of Fareed Zakaria's work. And we have found nothing that gives us cause for concern.”
Stelter concluded his defense of Zakaria by using the Internet style of linking to sources as a way of explaining away his colleague’s “attribution mistakes”:
For people like Zakaria, for people like me, for people who read scripts on television, the pressure is on us to be generous with attribution, to figure out ways to give credit where it’s due without bogging down our scripts. I think the web's norms of linking to sources are becoming the world’s norms. And the more transparent we are, the more trustworthy we will be.
See relevant transcript below.
CNN’s Reliable Sources
September 28, 2014
BRIAN STELTER: Finally this morning, a story about the ethical practices of television shows like this one. Earlier this month, anonymous bloggers who call themselves Our Bad Media accused one of my colleagues, Fareed Zakaria, of plagiarism, of stealing other people's words and passing them off as their own. They cited examples from Fareed Zakaria GPS, the show that airs right before this one.
I disagree with a lot of what the bloggers are alleging. But I want to take a couple of minutes here to tell you about it, because, number one, I believe media companies should be transparent, just like we want politicians and CEOs to be. And, number two, because my reporting leads me to believe that Zakaria's program made some attribution mistakes, a small number, to be fair, but they are the kinds of mistakes that other journalists can learn from, and viewers too.
First, in the interest of transparency, let me say that I trusted Zakaria before these allegations, and I still trust him after studying all of it. He is one of a kind, one of the sharpest thinkers on world affairs anywhere. But these bloggers' claims have gotten attention partly because prior claims of plagiarism were leveled against Zakaria in 2012. Back then, another blog pointed out that he had cribbed from a New Yorker article while writing his column for TIME magazine. He said he had confused his notes, and he apologized.
CNN kept GPS off of to air for two weeks while it reviewed his on-air work, and then reinstated him, indicating no other serious offenses were found. Well, the bloggers at Our Bad Media claimed they did find some. It’s clear to me that these anonymous people are waging a campaign against Zakaria, not just against his CNN work, but his columns and books, too. I believe that most of their claims about GPS, 26 total, do not hold up under close scrutiny. The closer you look, the less it looks like capital-P plagiarism.
But when you zoom out, there's a perception problem. The perception is that, as Kelly McBride of the Poynter Institute told Politico, “It seems obvious that Fareed was overly reliant on his source material.” McBride called some of the examples low-level plagiarism. Politico reporter Dylan Byers likened them to misdemeanors. And here is an example. One of the "What in the World?" segments on GPS back in June appears to have lifted two sentences from an appeals court ruling without attribution.
In a handful of other cases, it seems like parts of Zakaria's segments were inspired by articles in The Economist, The New York Times, et cetera. It seems like he took raw material from the articles, reworded a bit of it, and then added his own insights. Again, what appear to be misdemeanors plucked from hundreds of episodes of GPS. But shows like GPS and this one strive for the highest standards.
So this is the part where I wish I could tell Zakaria's side of the story. For instance, many TV scripts are written by producers. So did Zakaria write the questionable passages himself or did his producers? But Zakaria declined to camera for an interview with me. CNN’s P.R. people have also declined to comment, other than to say that “CNN has the highest confidence in the excellence and integrity of Fareed Zakaria's work. And we have found nothing that gives us cause for concern.”
So, I can only tell you what my reporting has led me to believe. I believe the perception in this case is worse than the reality. But I understand why there have been raised eyebrows. We are in the business of raising eyebrows, after all. Beyond just GPS, television newscasts are inspired by newspaper and web stories all the time. We run with their ideas, and sometimes they run with our ideas. Sometimes, we don't acknowledge it because we're short on time, and maybe, just maybe, because we want to sound all knowing, like we didn't need the help.
That is not good enough. For people like Zakaria, for people like me, for people who read scripts on television, the pressure is on us to be generous with attribution, to figure out ways to give credit where it’s due without bogging down our scripts. I think the web's norms of linking to sources are becoming the world’s norms. And the more transparent we are, the more trustworthy we will be.
— Jeffrey Meyer is a News Analyst at the Media Research Center. Follow Jeffrey Meyer on Twitter.
