Here's a summary
of four big newspaper stories that appeared on Friday, February 7. None
were covered by the broadcast networks:
-- The Boston
Globe carried a front page story reporting that the investigation of Ickes
"is being expanded to explore his dealings with a Massachusetts donor
who last year became the nation's biggest individual donor to the
Democratic Party, official said. The donor, Arnold Hiatt of Weston, the
Chairman of the Stride Rite Foundation, gave $500,000 to Democratic Party
committees after discussing suggestions with Ickes about how to donate the
money."
-- The same day
the Los Angeles Times reported that of the four Asian businessmen who
Clinton dined with at a July 30 meeting which eventually raised $500,000,
two could not legally donate to U.S. election campaigns.
-- The Wall
Street Journal recounted the payoff for two Boston businessmen who
attended a White House coffee. Alan Leventhal and Fred Seigel "went
on to collect $3 million for the President's campaign...Last fall, they
got what they wanted: Their company, Energy Capital Partner, was picked by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development for a major lending role
in a new $200 million program to make federally assisted housing more
energy efficient."
The donors got a
great deal, the Journal discovered: "Breaking precedent, HUD entered
into an arrangement allowing Energy Capital to be repaid ahead of the
government if housing development loans defaulted. In another unusual
twist, the federal notice outlining the loan program mentioned Energy
Capital and Mr. Seigel by name."
-- A front page
USA Today story began: "A controversial 230,000 name White House
computer list now under congressional investigation includes far more
political fundraising information than presidential aides have admitted,
Gannett News Service has learned. Internal documents given to GNS show the
database, from its very inception three years ago, was used, in part, for
keeping track of people who had contributed to President Clinton's
political campaign."
ABC's World News
Tonight: No mention of any of these items on Friday or Saturday night.
CBS Evening News: No story Friday or Saturday night.
NBC Nightly News: No story Friday or Saturday night.
2) Sunday brought
three relevant stories.
-- First, news
that the new Time magazine included a story that Independent Counsel
Kenneth Starr is exploring whether
Webster Hubbell
got hush money arranged by Clinton associates. Time revealed that top
Clinton aide Michael Berman arranged in 1994 for consulting deal with
Time-Warner.
-- Second, the
New Yorker magazine released a big piece by James Stewart, author of Blood
Sport, in which James McDougal claims that contrary to his earlier
testimony, Bill Clinton did attend a meeting in which an illegal loan was
discussed. McDougal also claimed that his wife Susan and Bill Clinton had
an affair in 1992.
-- Third, the Los
Angeles Times revealed that "In the two years before the November
election, the President and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton arranged for
at least 577 friends and supporters to stay overnight at the White House,
including many major party contributors..."
Network coverage:
ABC World News
Sunday: Two full stories -- Jackie Judd reviewed the New Yorker piece,
though not the affair charge. Judd began: "Jim McDougal is now
telling prosecutors that Bill Clinton was involved in helping solicit an
illegal loan for McDougal's ex-wife Susan..." Next, reporter Carla
Davis picked up on the LA Times piece, noting that "the list of
overnight guests includes Hollywood's rich and elite, including Steven
Spielberg and Lew Wasserman, who each contributed at least $300,000 to the
DNC." Davis also mentioned charges that Ickes wrote a memo to a
potential donor on "how and where to contribute," but she
concluded with the White House spin:
"But White
House counsel Lanny Davis told ABC News today that Ickes did nothing
improper since he did not solicit the contribution, only directed it. And,
Davis says, there is no indication Ickes did anything else improper at any
other time."
CBS Evening News
on February 9: Not a syllable about any of the Sunday stories.
NBC Nightly News: Brief anchor-read item on McDougal changing his story.
3) Monday
newspaper readers learned of two new developments on the Clinton scandal
front:
-- Boston Globe reporter Michael Kranish led his front page article:
"Going well beyond what the White House has been willing to admit,
former Democratic National Committee chairman Donald Fowler said in an
interview that the DNC routinely solicited campaign donations from people
after they attended White House coffees with President Clinton."
NBC Nightly News
devoted the least time of the three networks to OJ, just five minutes, and
found time to summarize an American Dietetic Association survey of
airports which found that the Chicago, Seattle and Pittsburgh airports
offer the "widest variety of wholesome foods." But, NBC couldn't
squeeze in anything about Clinton.
CBS Evening News
dedicated half the show (11 minutes and forty seconds) to OJ, but, though
CBS never told viewers on Sunday what James McDougal now says about
Clinton, it did find time for Dan Rather to tell viewers Susan McDougal's
view:
"Another new
twist in the Whitewater investigation. Susan McDougal, President Clinton's
former Whitewater partner, spoke with CBS News affiliate KTHV in Little
Rock Arkansas today and she said her former husband and Whitewater
partner, James McDougal, is now quote 'lying.' to try to get a lighter
sentence for his role in a fraudulent Arkansas bank loan case. She says
he's trying to do this by reversing his previous sworn testimony and now
trying to implicate President Clinton."
Rather failed to
note that Susan McDougal is in jail because she refuses to answer
questions before a grand jury.
Reviewing the
three evening shows over the past two weeks, two glaring holes jump out:
a) ABC's World News Tonight has yet to mention the White House database.
b) NBC Nightly News has not yet told viewers anything about the charges
surrounding Harold Ickes.
4) Tuesday night
February 11 Court TV will air a two-hour special edition of Cochran &
Grace dedicated to the Food Lion case. Yes, that's Cochran as in Johnnie.
The 10p-12 midnight ET show, USA Today reported, will air Prime Time
Live's original 1992 report as well as Food Lion's 15 minute response
which shows outtakes from ABC's undercover work. I've seen the Food Lion
tape and it's pretty indicting of ABC.
Wednesday night
Prime Time Live will look at the use of hidden cameras and how they
covered Food Lion. The Washington Post reported that ABC offered Food Lion
two minutes for an unedited response. Later Wednesday night ABC will air a
90 minute Viewpoint, hosted by Ted Koppel in place of Nightline, on the
Food Lion case.
Speaking of the
outtakes tape, when the Fox News Channel showed some of them back on
January 22, the day of the punitive verdict, ABC reacted with outrage. ABC
News VP David Westin told the New York Times: "I find it outrageously
unfair that a news organization would proceed that way. The tape that Food
Lion presented is a gross distortion of what actually occurred."
MRC news analyst
Clay Waters caught this illuminating exchange on Larry King Live back on
January 23:
Larry King:
"Fox reporters say the outtakes, which were provided by Food Lion,
showed ABC reporters staging evidence of spoiled meat."
Donaldson:
"Well let me just answer that. These were outtakes that we didn't put
on the air. Now, Food Lion made the same assertion and wanted to bring it
to the court. And the judge said, having looked at all of this, No, there
is no basis for making that charge. There is nothing in these outtakes
that show staging. There is nothing in these outtakes that support Food
Lion's assertions."
Defending his
network, on the January 26 Fox News Sunday, Brit Hume noted that ABC had
filmed 45 hour of undercover tape and "Food Lion turns around and
takes from that 45 hours a tape that was produced for the trial -- about
20 minutes or so worth -- and produces a video that makes ABC look every
bit as bad in the news business as Food Lion looked in the food business.
It's the first I can remember an organization under assault from the news
media doing to the news media what it claimed the news media had done to
it."