CyberAlert -- 06/29/2001 -- CBS's New Respect for Robertson
CBS's New Respect for Robertson; Mitchell's Showed Castro Saying Bush "Appointed"; Stossel: "Totalitarian Left" Afraid of Critics 1 But on Thursday's CBS Evening News Dan Rather expressed new respect with Robertson transformed from part of "the self-described Religious Right" to being an "entrepreneur." Rather announced on his June 28 show: "There's a follow up tonight to CBS News investigations into possible market manipulation in the energy business to maximize profits. This could be a remarkable case in point. One time Republican presidential candidate, TV evangelist and entrepreneur Pat Robertson says just listen to what happened to him." Reporter Wyatt Andrews proceeded to outline Robertson's claim that he's been blocked from buying a shut down California refinery because unnamed an oil company has blocked his loan by threatening to pull all its business from the bank. Andrews helpfully outlined the conspiracy: "If that information is accurate, why would big oil care? Senator Ron Wyden, who today appeared with Robertson, says Big Oil is restricting all refinery output to keep gasoline prices high." Hmmm. Maybe Robertson's problems have something to do with how he is unqualified to operate a refinery. And why is a conservative like Robertson in bed with a left-wing Senator? CBS didn't explore those angles, though Andrews did concede that current refinery output of gasoline is at record levels. A day
after Katherine Harris's retort to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
Dan Rather picked up on it. On the June 28 CBS Evening News Rather read
this short item: Just before that item, CBS ran a brief story by Bob Schieffer on a new charge that Roger Clinton took $50,000 to get pardon for a heroin trafficker in the Gambino family, a charge her lawyer claimed is being made just "to embarrass Bill Clinton." Andrea's All-Nighter with Fidel. Though the Committee to Protect Journalists in May named Fidel Castro one of the "Ten Worst Enemies of the Press" for 2001, NBC's Andrea Mitchell had an amiable chat with him Wednesday night which was featured on Thursday's Today and NBC Nightly News. Only in one sentence in her evening report did she mention the lack of political freedom in Cuba. On Today Mitchell relayed how Castro insisted Juan Miguel and Elian were free to stay in the U.S. and how "he told me that the Cuban people last year were so determined to get Elian back that some extremists even wanted to send military commandos to the United States." Later, on Nightly News, she showed Castro denouncing Bush: "He was not elected. He was appointed President of the United States." Sounds like Castro watches Geraldo. And who exactly "elected" Castro? -- Today, June 28. MRC analyst Geoffrey
Dickens took down her summary of her session with the dictator, though she
never employed the term: "Well on this first anniversary of Elian
Gonzalez's return home to Cuba the Fidel Castro government is not planning
any big anniversary celebration. But during three hours of conversation
with Fidel Castro that went into the early hours of this morning he told
me that the Cuban people last year were so determined to get Elian back
that some extremists even wanted to send military commandos to the United
States. Castro met me at his offices where he typically works all night.
[Clip of Mitchell shaking hands with Castro: "Thank you for seeing
us."] -- NBC Nightly News. A few hours later NBC had
time to put together a regular taped report with soundbites from Castro.
As transcribed by the MRC's Brad Wilmouth, Mitchell began by expressing
her typical awe of Castro's hard work: After some discussion about succession
which Mitchell raised because of Castro's collapse at a rally over the
weekend, Mitchell continued: "Castro has been in office so long,
he's antagonized ten American Presidents. Now he's sizing up George W.
Bush, especially because of Bush's close political and family ties to
anti-Castro voters in Florida." You'd think Mitchell might have wondered why Castro gave her such a free hand when he oppresses other journalists. Maybe it has something to do with how her stories don't require any censorship to comply with Castro's standards. The MRC's Rich Noyes alerted me to how in
May the Committee to Protect Journalists named Fidel Castro one of the
"Ten Worst Enemies of the Press" for 2001. They asserted: ABC's John Stossel lashed out on Wednesday's O'Reilly Factor on FNC at the "totalitarian left" which wants to "silence critics" and persuaded some parents to insist interviews with their kids be pulled from Stossel's Friday night special which dares to question the environmental left's orthodoxy. On Thursday's Good Morning America he
offered a milder rebuke about how he's "upset that activists got to
these parents and frightened them about me." On the June 28 GMA
Charles Gibson asked him, as observed by MRC analyst Jessica Anderson:
"This special has touched off some controversy. Some people came
forward and objected to interviews that had been done with their children,
two months after the interviews had been done, and asked that the
interviews be removed and they have been taken out. Every TV writer in the
country seems to have weighed in on this. Your comment on it." For background on this trumped-up liberal
controversy, go to: In Thursday's Washington Post, Howard Kurtz relayed Stossel's comments on FNC's The O'Reilly Factor the night before. An excerpt from Kurtz's June 28 story: ABC's John Stossel hit back at his detractors yesterday, accusing environmental activists of having "brainwashed" a group of California parents into insisting that the network pull his interview with their grade-school children. Responding to his critics at the Washington-based Environmental Working Group, Stossel said on Fox News Channel's O'Reilly Factor: "I call them the totalitarian left. They want to silence people who criticize them." Ken Cook, the group's president, dismissed Stossel's comments as "preposterous," saying: "If anyone's trying to limit debate it's John Stossel, by suggesting commie lefties are behind this as some sort of plot....He's a bully and he's finally been challenged." The heated words followed ABC News's decision to yank the footage of Stossel interviewing 10 children about environmental issues after the parents, who had contacted Cook's group, withdrew their consent. The parents say they were never told that Stossel was involved in the program, which airs Friday, and that he pushed the students to give the kind of responses he wanted. Stossel said he is "not happy" about ABC's decision to withdraw the footage but that "I see their point. These are children....If parents don't want their kids on, who are we to force them?" But Stossel contended that the parents had been "thrilled" and changed their mind only after "environmental educators talked to them. I don't blame them for being scared after what these people probably said about me....People said, 'He's going to distort. He lies. In the past, he's faked things.' They make up stories about me and the parents get scared."... On the footage that ABC has withdrawn, the children say yes when Stossel asks whether they thought America is more polluted and the air and water dirtier than they used to be -- which, as Stossel noted, is untrue. Stossel then says on the tape: "What sad distortions to feed children." In the O'Reilly interview, Stossel accused the school system of brainwashing students and, in another swipe at environmentalists, assailed "the extremists who dominate the debate." Environmental activists, said Stossel, "shouldn't be scaring people the way they are." END Excerpt For all of Kurtz's piece, go to: On Thursday afternoon the MRC's President, L. Brent Bozell, issued this statement in a press release: ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Media Research Center President Brent Bozell blasted the ultra-left wing Environmental Working Group for shamelessly manipulating parents of young children to attack ABC News correspondent John Stossel over his special on how scare tactics are used to perpetuate a one-sided view of environmental issues. "John Stossel has a point of view that is vastly under-represented on networks like ABC, and his reporting is factual and honest. That's why the Left can't stand him, and will stoop to anything to get him off the air. These parents were in the room when their kids were interviewed. They saw John Stossel interview them. They said nothing for two months. If they really had concerns they could have raised them then and there with ABC, but they've instead been manipulated by this left-wing group in search of an anti-Stossel publicity splash just as his report is about to air," Bozell said. "ABC is right to be sensitive to parents' concerns, but when parents can be so easily manipulated as part of a witch hunt to knock an honest journalist off the air, it sends a dangerous signal to all reporters who would dare question the Left's agenda -- on the environment or any other issue," Bozell said. "Mr. Stossel's premise is absolutely true as our own exhaustive research has found: information on environmental issues like global warming are presented in almost a totally one-sided fashion. As a parent myself I find it insulting and appalling that both adults and children are consistently bombarded with advocacy journalism that misleads and misinforms the very public to which the media are responsible," Bozell said. END reprint of press release Stossel's special, Tampering with Nature, airs tonight, Friday June 29 at 10pm EDT/PDT, 9pm CDT/MDT in the 20/20 slot. Washington, DC area cable subscribers will also be able to watch it at 8pm Saturday night on NewsChannel 8. Today's Washington Post TV listings reports that Stossel "questions whether warnings about genetic engineering, human cloning and global warming are overhyped." The vitriolic reaction from the environmental left is sure to be overhyped. -- Brent Baker >>>
Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions
which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible
donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert
readers and subscribers: >>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a
blank e-mail to:
mrccyberalert-subscribe >>>You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org. Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters.<<< |