MSNBC 'Journalists' Laugh and Sigh During Derisive Interview With Michigan Governor
Appearing on Wednesday's MSNBC Morning Joe, Michigan Governor
Rick Snyder was greeted with childish behavior by the show's panel of
left-wing pundits, who were unable to conceal their disgust with the
state's right-to-work legislation just signed into law by the
Republican. [Listen to the audio]
Contributor Richard Wolffe led off the disrespectful display when
Snyder defended the new law: "I don't believe this is actually
anti-union. If you look at it, I believe this is pro-worker." Wolffe
started laughing and rudely interrupted: "Hang on a second. Are
you really – are you serious? Are you serious? This is not anti-union?
This actually, at its core, undermines the ability for unions to
organize. So you can make many arguments you like, but saying it's not
anti-union..."
Moments later, co-host Joe Scarborough argued the law "undermines
unions' ability to stay vibrant, right?" Liberal journalist Carl
Bernstein could be heard in the background sighing and muttering
agreement with Scarborough: "Absolutely." After Snyder pushed back on
that characterization, Bernstein could again be heard sighing and
remarking: "Oh, come on."
Near the end of the segment, Scarborough called out Bernstein: "Hold
on, I think you should be penalized, Carl, because you were sighing –
you were sighing more than Al Gore in his first debate with George W.
Bush."
Despite that, Scarborough still encouraged Bernstein to ask Snyder a
question: "Carl, do you have a question for the Governor and not a
statement?...ask a question that will educate the viewers."
Bernstein came up with what he himself described as a "loaded
question": "How do you distinguish your position on this from a real
question about the welfare of workers in a state that historically
unions have had a huge role in, and in making Michigan a better place,
with cultural and political warfare – versus cultural and political
warfare?"
Scarborough chimed in: "That's a great question. That's a great
question. Governor?...That's a great question, period. Governor,
respond."
Here is a transcript of the December 12 exchange:
7:28AM ET
(...)
RICHARD
WOLFFE: Governor, as I understand it, the auto industry is still a
pretty big employer in your state. And the auto industry has actually
done really well in the last several years in spite of what you see as
being an obstacle to business, that is, having strong unions. How do you
square your statement that unions are somehow bad for business with the
fate and the thriving nature of the auto industry in your state over
the last several years?
SNYDER: Actually, I've never said unions are bad for business. And I
don't believe this is actually anti-union. If you look at it, I believe
this is pro-worker. Because the way I view it is, is workers now have
freedom to choose.
WOLFFE: Hang on a second. Are you really – are you serious? Are you
serious? This is not anti-union? This actually, at its core,
undermines the ability for unions to organize. So you can make many
arguments you like, but saying it's not anti-union-
SCARBOROUGH: Alright, alright, alright, Richard. Let him answer the question.
SNYDER: This does not deal with – this does not deal with organizing at
all. This does not deal with collective bargaining at all. This has
nothing to do with the relationship between an employer and a union.
This is about the relationship between unions and workers. And this is
about giving workers the freedom to choose, and unions have to be in a
position to present a good value proposition. If you look at the history
of unions in Michigan, we had very strong labor movement here. If you
go to the last century, people flocked to join the unions because they
saw value in that. Fast forward to today, shouldn't unions still have to
present a value proposition? And if they do, people will join. People
will want to be part of a union. And if they don't provide value, people
shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't see any value in.
So again, this should make unions more effective in terms of having to
put a value proposition to workers.
SCARBOROUGH: Governor, while I made a similar argument earlier that
workers shouldn't be compelled to have to pay from their salary to a
union with whom they disagree, I would not go so far as to say what
you've just said, which is that this helps unions. I mean, it undermines
unions'...
CARL BERNSTEIN: Absolutely.
SCARBOROUGH: ...ability to stay vibrant, right?
SNYDER: It really leaves it up to the union to decide and innovate as
to what their value proposition is. I don't view it as pro or
anti-union. Unions just need to be responsive to people to step up and
deliver value and workers have that choice and workers should have that
choice. They shouldn't be compelled to join something they don't see
value in.
BERNSTEIN: [Sighs] Oh, come on.
MIKE BARNICLE: Governor, if – if I agree with you, and if I heard your
statement that you just made correctly, that this is aimed at employees
not having to pay into something that they don't put a value on. So
according to the right-to-work legislation now, they can belong to a
union, but they don't have to have their dues extracted from their
paycheck because they don't put a value on it. Will those workers accept
the pay raises that the unions negotiate for them?
SNYDER: Well, again, they're essentially told they have to be in that
relationship. It's an exclusive relationship that the unions have with
the employer. So they don't have an option with that.
BARNICLE: So that's a rather divisive workplace in the future.
SNYDER: Again, in right-to-work states, you don't see that division.
Actually, we had good people up here in Michigan that came from
right-to-work states. And I talked to a number of them. I actually sat
with them during a press conference. And when you listen to them, they
actually decided to join the union because they saw value. But they
really appreciated having the choice. So again, if unions are showing
value, people will want to put in dollars to be contributors to
something that's giving them value.
SCARBOROUGH: Let me ask this.
BRZEZINSKI: Dare we? Dare we?
SCARBOROUGH: I don't know, because Carl – well, you know, Carl, I think-
BRZEZINSKI: Only if you're sweet.
SCARBOROUGH: Hold on, I think you should be penalized, Carl, because you were sighing...
BRZEZINSKI: I heard muttering.
SCARBOROUGH: ...you were sighing more than Al Gore in his first debate with George W. Bush.
BRZEZSINSKI: And muttering, which doesn't work.
BERNSTEIN: You're right. You're right.
SCARBOROUGH: Carl, do you have a question for the Governor and not a statement?
BRZEZINSKI: And it – yes.
BERNSTEIN: Sure.
SCARBOROUGH: Okay, go ahead.
BRZEZINSKI: 15 seconds.
BERNSTEIN: I have a question.
SCARBOROUGH: Governor, let's see how this works.
BERNSTEIN: I have a loaded question.
SCARBOROUGH: We're holding our – no, ask a question that will educate the viewers.
BERNSTEIN:
My loaded question would be, how do you distinguish your position on
this from a real question about the welfare of workers in a state that
historically unions have had a huge role in, and in making Michigan a
better place?
SCARBOROUGH: That's a great question. That's a great question. Governor?
BERNSTEIN: With cultural – with cultural and political warfare?
SCARBOROUGH: That's a great question, period. Governor, respond.
BERNSTEIN: Versus cultural and political warfare?
SNYDER: If you go back, again, in the last century, in the middle of
the century, the unions did a lot of great things. They helped with
working conditions, wages, so many great things. But if you come to
today, in many respects, unions are a declining percentage of the work
force. Michigan was just third in high-tech jobs being created in the
country. Most of those jobs are not going to be union jobs. So we're
seeing high-paying jobs come to Michigan without a union. And in fact,
if you looked at our state over the last decade, we've suffered a lot
being a not right-to-work in terms of our personal income, not just for
that reason, but for many reasons. We dropped from 16th to 36th in terms
of per capita income in our state. We've started to come back now. And I
believe giving workers choice, you look at the results in Indiana, they
have more and better jobs coming to Indiana today than they had before,
and I think we'll see that same phenomenon in Michigan.
BERNSTEIN: Good luck.
SCARBOROUGH: Governor Rick Snyder, we really do appreciate you coming on this morning.
BRZEZINSKI: Nice to meet you.
SCARBOROUGH: We know you're in the middle of a tough political battle
up there, but it's very important for our viewers to hear what's going
on on both sides. It's very important for me because, well, I don't like
being alone all the time. Thanks a lot, Governor, for being here.
BRZEZINSKI: Thank you very much.
SCARBOROUGH: We look forward to seeing you soon.
SNYDER: Thank you.
