CyberAlert -- 08/04/1998 -- Clarence Thomas is "Wrong"

Only One Side to Campaign Finance "Reform;" Clarence Thomas is "Wrong"

1) Monicagate still topped ABC, CNN and FNC Monday night as Dan Rather claimed Starr is probing Clinton's "personal life." NBC's Bob Faw, however, contended that Clinton fueled the "low-brow culture" now engulfing his presidency.

2) ABC's Linda Douglass championed campaign finance "reform" with four soundbites from advocates but not one syllable from an opponent.

3) Clarence Thomas "is wrong," declared Gannett's Deborah Mathis. "We expected a black Supreme Court judge to be more sensitive to the right way of thinking," meaning the liberal way.

4) More from the Hamptons: Alec Baldwin declared Hillary Clinton "the most effective First Lady in the history of the United States." U.S. News owner Mort Zuckerman dined with the Clintons.

1

Of the broadcast networks, only ABC led Monday night with Monicagate as did CNN and FNC. CBS and NBC went first with the heat wave. All the networks noted the White House decision to appeal to the Supreme Court the lower court decision ordering Bruce Lindsey to appear and all but CBS squeezed in at least a brief mention of a leak about the leaks, specifically, that a higher court had decided that while Judge Norma Holloway Johnson may probe leaks from Starr's office she cannot let Clinton's lawyers question Starr's staff.

CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather again asserted how Starr is probing Clinton's "personal life," but CBS reporter Scott Pelley emphasized how even top White House aides don't really believe Clinton's story. NBC Nightly News dedicated its In Depth segment to the scandal with Andrea Mitchell running through options of what Clinton could now say followed by Bob Faw with a very tough piece on how the scandal reflects a cruder culture. Asserted Faw about Clinton: "The low-brow culture he cultivated has engulfed his presidency. And traditionalists argue that hurts everyone."

Here's a run down of Monday night, August 3 coverage of the Monicagate scandal:

-- ABC's World News Tonight opened with Jackie Judd on the dress and how the FBI should know by now "if semen stains are on the dress." Judd noted that FBI Director Louis Freeh has warned against any leaks of test results before announcing: "ABC News has learned that the appeals court ruled that Judge Norma Holloway Johnson was wrong is authorizing the President's attorney, David Kendall, to obtain documents from Starr as well as interview prosecutors."

Anchor Charlie Gibson then asked about Clinton: "Will he take back his claim that he had no sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky? A virtual chorus of politicians and pundits are now saying perhaps he should." From the White House Sam Donaldson found no evidence he will revise his story line, though he ran soundbites from Leon Panetta and Orrin Hatch urging such a course change and observed that with polls showing the public against impeachment Republicans will "pay a price" if they have to move against the President.

-- CBS Evening News. Following stories on the National Guard delivering hay in Oklahoma and on how the heat has reduced crime in Dallas, Dan Rather intoned:
"President Clinton moved today to counter special prosecutor Ken Starr's latest push to investigate his personal life. Lawyers for the President asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reject Starr's demand for testimony from Clinton aide and confidant Bruce Lindsey."
Scott Pelley focused on nervousness at the White House over the dress test results: "Senior aides find themselves publicly defending and privately doubting. Today one senior adviser began a conversation by saying 'I believe him.' Then, the same adviser lamented 'The President does not feel free to turn to any of us and say, 'Here are the facts, here's what happened.'"

-- CNN's The World Today at 8pm ET. Wolf Blitzer opened the show by asserting that Clinton's "advisers fear the worst" on what the FBI will find on the dress. Blitzer then ran competing soundbites about whether Starr should let Clinton know the results before the President's August 17 testimony and told viewers that the January search of Lewinsky's apartment missed the dress because Lewinsky had moved it last fall to her mother's apartment in New York City.
Next, John King examined the decision to appeal over Bruce Lindsey, co-anchor Jim Moret jumped in with breaking news that Starr had subpoenaed White House counsel Lanny Breuer to appear Tuesday and then co-anchor Joie Chen relayed the leaks decision. Finally, Bob Franken provided a full report on comments Starr made during and after a speech in Toronto to the ABA. Franken emphasized how Starr denied running roughshod over political institutions in his investigation.

-- FNC's 7pm ET Fox Report began with Jim Angle on how Mike McCurry's fill-in, Barry Toiv, maintained Clinton will not change his story. Angle also covered the Lindsey appeal before FNC went to David Shuster, who passed along this picture of Lewinsky's debriefing by Starr's team: "Sources close to her describe the session on Monday as especially intense. They said she was questioned on the most intimate aspects of her relationship with the President, including how Mr. Clinton allegedly stained her dress."

-- NBC Nightly News. For the In Depth segment Tom Brokaw wondered "what story will Mr. Clinton tell?" Recalling Clinton's 60 Minutes interview, Andrea Mitchell asserted and then asked: "Over and over he has proved he is the Houdini of politicians. But this time is there an easy escape?" Intermingled with clips from David Gergen and David Shrum on the advisability of each move, Mitchell forwarded three choices:
"Option One: Deny Everything, hang tough....Option Two: Admit Everything, a full mea culpa....Option Three, if he has not told the truth, a Carefully Worded Admission."
Concluded Mitchell: "In fact, more and more Democrats worried about their own re-election say until the President comes forward with a full explanation there will be only more confusion. And more battles over who is telling the truth."

Tom Brokaw then ruminated: "What does this scandal, and the way it's taken on a life of its own, say about who we are and what we care about. There's a good deal of evidence the country is at once repulsed and fascinated by what it is seeing and reading."
Bob Faw asserted that the country is getting cruder and crude sells as TV's South Park and Jerry Springer demonstrate. Faw insisted Clinton has no one to blame but himself:
"Now the circle is complete. The President who went on MTV and was asked about his underwear finds his presidency hinges on a blue cocktail dress. As one columnist put it, the low-brow culture he cultivated has engulfed his presidency. And traditionalists argue that hurts everyone."
Viewers then heard a rare soundbite from a cultural conservative, in this case Carmen Pate of Concerned Women for America. Faw balanced her with leftist Mark Crispin Miller who blamed not Clinton or the public but sensationalistic media values. Faw concluded by blaming the public. Over video of Springer and the new video of Clinton hugging Lewinsky, he lamented that "most of the country is right at home" with both.

2

In television news coverage of campaign finance reform there's only one side that deserves air time -- those in favor. The latest example: an August 3 World News Tonight story on a successful House vote for the liberal Shays-Meehan bill which would curb free speech and protect incumbents by restricting what issue groups could tell voters. But ABC viewers heard neither of those points. Instead of portraying "reform" opponents as civil rights and free speech champions, Linda Douglass didn't even find their views worth mentioning.

Instead, her idea of a news story was to present the views of four supporters. Douglass began: "Tonight, against all odds, they pulled off an upset, persuading a majority of the House to vote in favor of a sweeping campaign reform bill that would ban large, unregulated political contributions."

After soundbites from a Democratic Congressman in favor and the co-sponsor, liberal Republican Chris Shays, Douglass depicted the tricky opposition Shays and Massachusetts Democrat Marty Meehan had to overcome:
"Last Spring House Speaker Newt Gingrich tried to prevent a vote on the measure, but members of his own party forced him to back down. Then GOP leaders tried to strangle the bill with political tricks, loading it up with controversial amendments and debating it sporadically late at night."

Douglass then let Democratic leader David Bonier denounce Republicans who fought "reform" and ran a soundbite from Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21 who contended that the "corrupt system" must be reformed. Alas, Douglass lamented, victory may not yet be at hand, concluding her one-sided story: "But even if campaign reform survives in the House this week, it must then go on to the Senate and one Senator predicted we are more likely to see Elvis alive than see it pass there."

Monday night Nightline focused on the glow of the success of Shays-Meehan with Forrest Sawyer following Shays around Capitol Hill as he battled toward victory. At least Nightline grudgingly conceded there is another side and allocated a few minutes in the otherwise all pro-reform show to Senator Mitch McConnell so he could explain how someone could actually oppose "reform."

It isn't as if opponents are hard to find. As a July 13 press release from the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) reported, 53 "issue-oriented citizen advocacy organizations" oppose Shays-Meehan. As the MRC's Tim Graham reminded me, the NRLC Web page features a whole section on arguments against the liberal "reform" bills: http://www.nrlc.org [1]. Here are a couple of excerpts from one analysis on how reformers will restrict free speech:
They "would generally prohibit corporations (including issue-oriented corporations such as NRLC) and unions from paying for communications to the public at any time of the year that federal regulators consider to be 'for the purpose of influencing a Federal election,' if that communication is pursuant to any 'general or particular understanding' with the candidate (for example, an understanding that responses to a candidate questionnaire will be disseminated to the public), or if the sponsoring organization has any of 10 broad categories of links (direct or indirect, actual or presumed) to a member of Congress or other candidate, including the mere sharing of vendors....
"Even if a group avoids both direct and indirect contacts (so-called 'coordination') with 'candidates' and avoids commentary on 'candidates,' the bill would prohibit the group from paying for broadcast communications that even mention the name or contain the likeness of a member of Congress, or candidate for Congress, for 60 days before a primary or general election....
"All of these restrictions would apply even to communications that seek to alert citizens to approaching votes on critical issues in Congress -- for example, the September, 1996 votes in the U.S. House and U.S. Senate on whether to override President Clinton's veto of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act."

3

Deborah Mathis of the Gannett News Service has shown that she's a liberal black activist first, a reporter second. MRC news analyst Jessica Anderson caught her on this past weekend's Inside Washington denouncing Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for his "wrong" thinking. He should be attacked, as he was before his speech last week to the National Bar Association, because his rulings are not "more sensitive to the right way of thinking," meaning the liberal way.
Mathis asserted: "Well, he has it right that he has that right to depart from what is considered to be the black mainstream in a way of thinking -- that's fine. We're the first to agree with that. I would champion him on that. What is, the reason the people oppose him is that because that thinking is wrong, and that's why. And we expected a black Supreme Court judge to be more sensitive to the right way of thinking than he turned out to be. It's not that he doesn't have the right to do it, and he is a black man, a man in America, as he says. But he's not just any black man in America. He's someone who has the power to force his ideas and his way of thinking upon the rest of us. He's a life-altering black American man."

But it's admirable for liberal blacks to try to force their views on him?

4

A bit more on Clinton's fundraising trip to the Hamptons detailed in the August 3 CyberAlert. In the August 3 Washington Post reporter John Harris offered two more items worth highlighting.
First, another gushing tribute from actor Alec Baldwin, who along with his wife, actress Kim Basinger, hosted a big fundraiser. Harris relayed: "'One Democrat stands alone in her contribution to the President's success,' Baldwin said, calling Hillary Clinton 'the most effective First Lady in the history of the United States.'"

Second, Harris also reported that "after the Baldwin-Basinger fundraiser in Amagansett, the Clintons repaired with that couple for dinner at the nearby Turtle Crossing restaurant." Joining them: Chevy Chase, Steve Spielberg and U.S. News & World Report owner and Editor-in-Chief Mortimer Zuckerman, all of whom had attended the fundraiser.

Back on the July 7 Good Morning America, MRC news analyst Clay Waters noticed, Zuckerman decried media interest in Monicagate and praised the public for not caring:
"I think, not to underestimate the American public. If you just look at one story where the press really almost entirely went one way and the public went the other way, was the whole episode Monica Lewinsky. I mean there you had a story where the press was so consistently hostile on this story, and the public stood back and said 'Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, we're not going to go along with it until we're a lot further down the road.' The public is a lot more sophisticated because they've been exposed to too many stories that turned out not to be true."

No wonder Clinton invited him to dinner. -- Brent Baker [2]

>>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-deductible donation. Use the secure donations page set up for CyberAlert readers and subscribers:
http://www.mrc.org/donate [3]

>>>To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: mrccyberalert-subscribe
@topica.com [4]. Or, you can go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters [5]. Either way you will receive a confirmation message titled: "RESPONSE REQUIRED: Confirm your subscription to mrccyberalert@topica.com." After you reply, either by going to the listed Web page link or by simply hitting reply, you will receive a message confirming that you have been added to the MRC CyberAlert list. If you confirm by using the Web page link you will be given a chance to "register" with Topica. You DO NOT have to do this; at that point you are already subscribed to CyberAlert.
To unsubscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4].
Send problems and comments to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4].

>>>You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, send a blank e-mail to: cybercomment@mrc.org [4]. Or, go to: http://www.mrc.org/newsletters [5].<<<