Spinning the sequester in the New York Times. After weeks of cringing in fear over the supposedly damaging federal cuts due to take effect tomorrow
(even as the public shrugs them off) Jonathan ...
The New York Times glimpses the cold hand of "austerity" in a $3,500-billion dollar federal budget? "Cuts of even larger size are scheduled to take effect every year over the next 10, signaling an ...
Reporter Jonathan Weisman is shocked, shocked to find partisanship in the U.S. Senate: "Without
naming names, Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, offered a
biting label for the ...
New York Times reporter Jonathan Weisman can't understand why the House GOP didn't embrace the fiscal cliff agreement, and wonders why they cling to their bizarre opposition to tax hikes on the ...
A front-page story declares Obama has a "mandate" to raise taxes, while John Harwood ponders why stubborn House Republicans can't be more responsible and agree to raise taxes on the so-called ...
Does reporter Jonathan Weisman think "far right" conservatives should just shut up? "Even before conservatives began speaking out of turn,
pragmatists were pressing the leadership to take up and ...
Conservatives, you say? From Jonathan Weisman's front-page Times story: "Speaker Boehner took as
much fire from conservatives as from Democrats after proposing a
deficit-reduction plan that ...
Jennifer Steinhauer shone sour light on a bright spot for Republicans in yesterday's vote: "Deep disapproval of Congress and dissatisfaction with partisan
division appeared no match for ...
New York Times reporter Jonathan Weisman made Friday's front
page on the Republicans' uphill struggles to take over the Senate, and got in a second day of shots against Indiana Republican ...
New York Times reporters Jonathan Weisman and
Michael Cooper both suggested Mitt Romney would be hurt by controversial comments on rape made
by Indiana's Republican Senate candidate Richard ...
