CBSs Axelrod Heats Up Energy Price By One-Third
Published: 12/12/2005 3:00 PM ET
Forecasting a bleak sweater-swaddled winter for middle class
Americans on the December 12 Evening News, CBS correspondent Jim
Axelrod exaggerated the rise of natural gas heating costs by about
one third over the government-estimated average.
Axelrod also omitted good news on the oil and gas industrys faster-than-expected recovery in the Gulf of Mexico while portraying a New York woman with outstanding heating bills from 2004 as just one of many middle class Americans who will suddenly find themselves trapped by rising heating costs.
Axelrod opened his piece in an Irvington, N.Y. womans kitchen: Nikki Wilson wishes that doing the math meant nothing more troubling than helping her son with his homework, he said, adding, still behind on last year's heating bill, she's looking at a 30 percent hike in her natural gas prices this year, and has no idea how to make the numbers work.
Axelrod then aired a clip of Wilson complaining about having to choose between Christmas presents and paying her heating bill. Rather than assign at least some personal responsibility for her plight to Wilson, who reportedly earned $42,000-per-year, Axelrod instead cast a dire warning for middle class income-earners. With the price of home heating oil now, this is no longer a matter of just another blanket on the bed or lowering the thermostat a few more degrees. Its in our heads in a way its never been before, he claimed.
Apparently to Axelrod the fear about the cost of home heating was worse than any time in American history, including the energy crunch in the Carter administration or the dire straits of the Great Depression.
While Axelrod correctly blamed rising natural gas and oil prices on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita damaging oil and gas facilities in the Gulf Coast, the CBS reporter known for hyping $6-a-gallon gas in Atlanta just after Katrina devastated New Orleans, exaggerated the cost of natural gas, saying natural gas prices alone could spike by as much as 50 percent. But in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook released six days before Axelrods report, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated natural gas prices will go up only an average of 37.8 percent. Axelrod overstated the cost by about a third. The EIA also found that overall average heating costs would rise 25.7 percent.
The same December 6 EIA forecast noted that the interconnectivity of the natural gas gathering system has helped speed the recovery of shut-in production as suppliers reroute gas flow around damaged pipelines to active processing plants.
The term shut-in refers to natural gas that could be produced, but the production of which is curtailed either for lack of buyers, government mandate, or other reasons like pipeline disruptions following a major hurricane, the case with Katrina-related cost hikes.
The EIA also noted accelerated recovery from their November estimate, predicting, a 6.5 percent drop in shut-in natural gas by March 2006.
Axelrods faulty economic reporting has been reported in Business & Media Institute publications such One Economy, Two Spins, and the Media Research Centers October 2004 study, The Ten Worst Media Distortions of Campaign 2004, which documented Axelrod spinning a good economy into bad news.
The Business & Media Institute has also documented how CBS and other networks have covered energy prices with an alarmist tone while ignoring improving winter heating forecasts.
Axelrod also omitted good news on the oil and gas industrys faster-than-expected recovery in the Gulf of Mexico while portraying a New York woman with outstanding heating bills from 2004 as just one of many middle class Americans who will suddenly find themselves trapped by rising heating costs.
Axelrod opened his piece in an Irvington, N.Y. womans kitchen: Nikki Wilson wishes that doing the math meant nothing more troubling than helping her son with his homework, he said, adding, still behind on last year's heating bill, she's looking at a 30 percent hike in her natural gas prices this year, and has no idea how to make the numbers work.
Axelrod then aired a clip of Wilson complaining about having to choose between Christmas presents and paying her heating bill. Rather than assign at least some personal responsibility for her plight to Wilson, who reportedly earned $42,000-per-year, Axelrod instead cast a dire warning for middle class income-earners. With the price of home heating oil now, this is no longer a matter of just another blanket on the bed or lowering the thermostat a few more degrees. Its in our heads in a way its never been before, he claimed.
Apparently to Axelrod the fear about the cost of home heating was worse than any time in American history, including the energy crunch in the Carter administration or the dire straits of the Great Depression.
While Axelrod correctly blamed rising natural gas and oil prices on Hurricanes Katrina and Rita damaging oil and gas facilities in the Gulf Coast, the CBS reporter known for hyping $6-a-gallon gas in Atlanta just after Katrina devastated New Orleans, exaggerated the cost of natural gas, saying natural gas prices alone could spike by as much as 50 percent. But in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook released six days before Axelrods report, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated natural gas prices will go up only an average of 37.8 percent. Axelrod overstated the cost by about a third. The EIA also found that overall average heating costs would rise 25.7 percent.
The same December 6 EIA forecast noted that the interconnectivity of the natural gas gathering system has helped speed the recovery of shut-in production as suppliers reroute gas flow around damaged pipelines to active processing plants.
The term shut-in refers to natural gas that could be produced, but the production of which is curtailed either for lack of buyers, government mandate, or other reasons like pipeline disruptions following a major hurricane, the case with Katrina-related cost hikes.
The EIA also noted accelerated recovery from their November estimate, predicting, a 6.5 percent drop in shut-in natural gas by March 2006.
Axelrods faulty economic reporting has been reported in Business & Media Institute publications such One Economy, Two Spins, and the Media Research Centers October 2004 study, The Ten Worst Media Distortions of Campaign 2004, which documented Axelrod spinning a good economy into bad news.
The Business & Media Institute has also documented how CBS and other networks have covered energy prices with an alarmist tone while ignoring improving winter heating forecasts.
